User talk:Pi zero/Archive 18

Active discussions

Please do not edit the contents of this page. It is for historical reference only.

Adding image credit to archived articles

Is adding image credit to archived articles considered significant substantial change to violate archive policy?
•–• 04:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Image credit is documentation, rather than content, so not covered under the archive policy. We should not, of course, go hog-wild with it. What do you have in mind? --Pi zero (talk) 11:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Saw you edit an old article, and thought of asking. When I get the admin bits, that is something I might as well do when I have some free time.
•–• 13:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Sure. It's one of those little sprucing-up things we do here and there in the archives. --Pi zero (talk) 13:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Btw, happy new year.
•–• 13:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello Sir, Please help me get back the article i did not do anything intentionally. Please sir. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Smritisingh242242 (talkcontribs) 16:53, 22 February 2020 (UTC)


Can you perm-erase the last edit on User talk:FaNoFtHeAiRiCeLaNd by an IP address? Thanks. FaNoFtHeAiRiCeLaNd (talk) 23:18, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

@FaNoFtHeAiRiCeLaNd: Done. --Pi zero (talk) 23:32, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, was hoping you could erase it so it did not appear in history and there was no edit summary; just that magic vanishing trick FaNoFtHeAiRiCeLaNd (talk) 23:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
@FaNoFtHeAiRiCeLaNd: Cleaned edit history. --Pi zero (talk) 23:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello Sir, This was my 1st article from my news report channel . Is there any mistake? i will correct it as you want please dont delete my article. I took a very long time to publish it. As it's my 1st time please excuse me of my mistake and let me know so i can correct it. Thank you for improving me as an reportor from India. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Smritisingh242242 (talkcontribs) 16:41, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Prepared stories and other unpublished stories

Hi. Looking at this category, it occurred to me that recently (maybe the last few years), at least two wikis have added a draft namespace for some articles/resources. I was just thinking that perhaps Wikinews could benefit from having a draft namespace for new unreviewed articles and these prepared stories. Certainly for new articles it would help reinforce that it is still a draft and not a published article. For the prepared stories, whilst I can see it was a useful place to store them originally, I think the project namespace is not the best place long term. I’d appreciate your views on this before I put it to the wider community. Cheers. -Green Giant (talk) 22:51, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

@Green Giant: I'm opposed to that, for now. Maybe someday (perhaps far) in the future, when we have massive semi-automation that's easily modified. A draft space would make things more complicated, and complications kill Wikinews projects. Simplicity is paramount. Every tiny thing we can do to make things easier, simpler, more intuitively obvious, we should do. It's easy to miss, I think, with all the noise we make about the need to make things easier (about which we're not wrong), that our machinery now runs miraculously smoothly. I've seen how difficult common tasks could easily be on a Wikinews project if things weren't as well set up as they are here; I suspect this did its part to destroy at least one Wikinews project. --Pi zero (talk) 23:42, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for the reply. I understand your points. I’m going to rename some of the prepared articles with a "Wikinews:Story preparation/" prefix so they all appear at the same stage. -Green Giant (talk) 01:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Category:Impeachment of Donald Trump

Ah yes, sorry I should have put something in the summaries. I was just trying to see if the articles could be presented better rather than all being listed under “U". -Green Giant (talk) 20:37, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Heh. Though I stand by my point, the bunch of them under "U" has a certain absurdist appeal, yes. --Pi zero (talk) 20:56, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Links in the old article 's body

There is an external link within this article. What should one do about it?
•–• 08:18, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

@Acagastya: Some thoughts.
  • I too, when I see external links in ancient article-bodies, feel an impulse to do something about it.
  • What I've sometimes done, if the link is still good, is to add (if it isn't already there) an External links section, down below Sources, in which to provide the link, when unlinking it in the article body.
  • If the link no longer works (or, more subtly, no longer goes where it used to go), sometimes one can find an archived copy to link from External links.
  • If the link is dead with no archive, typically one would just unlink it.
  • I think I've encountered some cases where moving the link to an External links section seemed to be losing something; I don't recall why. (I'm guessing it was more than, this article has slews of external links in it, fixing them all would be a bigger project than I'd care to take on atm; though there's that, too.) As I recall, when I'm unsure how to handle it I've generally left it for another day (or, more likely, another year). If there are other techniques I've used for coping with external links, I'm not thinking of them atm.
--Pi zero (talk) 13:23, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Can you review my new article?

Link to my article: NASA shuts down Spitzer Space Telescope --Aaron34weston (talk) 03:09, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

@Aaron34weston: Hi! I've just written up a set of review comments on the article, which you'll find on its talk page. --Pi zero (talk) 04:15, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Question regarding tools to make my life easier

I do mainly WikiGnome tasks such as adding {{delete}} and {{abandon}} tags. Do you know of any tools which make this sort of stuff easier? Seemplez 14:24, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

@Seemplez: There's what's available now, and there's what I hope to create in the longer term.

What I hope to create keeps dragging out, taking longer than I want it to. My current specific focus (when I get to it) is on setting up a tool to allow a template to determine context-sensitive information about the circumstances in which it is called, so that for example it could automatically offer situationally appropriate buttons to make various maintenance tasks easier. The larger picture of what I envision is broadly sketched by User:Pi zero/essays/vision/sisters and User:Pi zero/essays/Meta-assistance.

Regarding what is now available, I think there's something to assist in tagging articles for speedy deletion, but I'm not sure what. Perhaps User:Gryllida would be able to suggest something. --Pi zero (talk) 16:09, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Seemplez :-)
I use User:Gryllida/js/TagAbandoned.js and User:Gryllida/js/TagSpam.js, at User:Gryllida/common.js. That's User:Seemplez/common.js for you (which is linked from preferences under "Shared CSS/JSON/JavaScript for all skins").
If there is interest, I can modify TagSpam.js so that it prompts for deletion reason and inserts {{delete}} instead of {{spam}}.
Thanks and best regards, -- Gryllida (talk) 19:14, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
@Pi zero, Gryllida: Thanks for the suggestions. I was wondering what TagAbandoned and TagSpam are supposed to look like. Thanks, Seemplez 08:57, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
These scripts add new "tag as spam" and the like links, near "What links here" and "Related changes". In the timeless skin this is conveniently located in the right sidebar. If you are using another skin and the location of the buttons is not convenient to you, please let me know. Gryllida (talk) 07:03, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
For your and others' convenience, now I have added this and more documentation inside of the scripts at the top. Gryllida (talk) 07:07, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
@Seemplez: Re abandonment: When an article hasn't been touched for at least four full days (that's the simplest way to make the call), one puts at the top of it
That expands appropriately. --Pi zero (talk) 14:07, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
@Pi zero, Gryllida: Cheers for that, this is really helpful. Seemplez 08:45, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
No worries. Gryllida (talk) 22:03, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Question: Invoking commons pics with date of publication or possibly revision

The incident yesterday, where we had to make a local copy of a chart to keep it within time frame of the article, raised a question in my head. Why couldn't we simply call out a commons file with date or revision or some sort of ID? (I'm having trouble figuring out how to do this.) --Don't call 911 (talk) 15:52, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

@WhaatTF: It's my understanding that wiki markup has never provided a way to do that. --Pi zero (talk) 16:07, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Then.. we'd need a custom File template, right? Just as when [[w:]] didn't serve WN's purposes and was replaced by {{w}}. If it was deemed a doable solution (i.e. files are mapped and have IDs that can be pulled out with.), we can reach out to wiki community for guidance; or quiet possibly, I can learn templates coding for this occasion. What you think? --Don't call 911 (talk) 19:08, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
A template can't do anything that couldn't be done without it; only the template allows it to be done without worrying about the details of how it's done. {{w}} and {{missing image}} are extremely easy to use while hiding messy stuff under the hood; but the stuff they do could, in principle, be done without them. I do not believe there is any way of causing wiki markup to do this, therefore a template wouldn't help. (@Bawolff: any thoughts on this?) --Pi zero (talk) 19:52, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Pi Zero is correct. Linking to a specific version of an image is not supported in wikitext by MediaWiki (It is supported by MediaWiki itself as something extensions can do, it just isn't exposed to the user). FlaggedRevision does (depending on config) force the version of the image to be the one from the time the page was last reviewed [in theory anyways]. Bawolff 20:44, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Plainrock124 hits 1 million subscribers

You deleted this as “advertising or spam”. It’s neither. ICameHereForNews (talk) 06:02, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

@ICameHereForNews: You are quite right; my apologies. --Pi zero (talk) 07:14, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Suggested revdel So we don't keep personal spam on the site, I recommend deleting the content of the rev. Also, obviously, blocking the user. —Justin (koavf)TCM 12:33, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. —Justin (koavf)TCM 14:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)


What are you talking about? Why would we not sort "The Foo" as "Foo, The"? This is standard English. —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:32, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Too much of labour we didn't sign up for, for no apparent benefit, I would say. "Standard English"? Hmm. A language grows over time, the usage changes. And even though there are rules, they should be useful at the end of the day. Is there any advantage of changing that?
•–• 11:45, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
I might put it this way. If we don't get involved in the game of overriding default sort orders of categories in other categories, then that's fewer things for us to worry about. It's true that when alphabetizing stuff in English one usually leaves off "the" or "a/an" from the front, but we can simplify things by not attempting to alphabetize most stuff. It's mainly chronological ordering we care about in news, after all. --Pi zero (talk) 12:48, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

New source

Note that I have now found this source [1] that could help. Thanks, ICameHereForNews (talk) 04:14, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

This article


This article was meant to be deleted 3 days ago. Can you deal with it?

Happy March!

Seemplez 14:32, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

My new article

Can you check this article out? I believe it can be included because of this source [2] and this one too [3] ICameHereForNews (talk) 09:23, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

@ICameHereForNews: I made a few copyedits, and left some remarks on the article talk page. --Pi zero (talk) 13:58, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
@Pi zero: Even if the article is small, I still think that this story is worth being on wikinews because there are two sources in the article that should help. ICameHereForNews (talk) 22:55, 6 March 2020 (UTC)


It would be better if we create categories and use Primary election and United States presidential primary sooner than later.
•–• 11:41, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

I wonder. Playing devil's advocate, it would be another thing to keep track of when categorizing articles. (Categorization really wants to be semi-automatically assisted.) --Pi zero (talk) 13:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Or at least 2020 US presidential primary. Like FWC 2018, of EURO 2016.
•–• 05:50, 13 March 2020 (UTC)


I think we should not have the abbr as the redirect and instead use the expanded name. Right now, no page links to SARS, and it it is better if we reach a conclusion sooner than later.
•–• 05:49, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Some barnstars for you

Thank you tirelessly working on the Taliban category which would have been so tedious!

I had been keeping a track of the barnstars to award you, but I think I need to stop postponing that.
•–• 19:55, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Thankyou. --Pi zero (talk) 20:21, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
And one more, for managing to review gigantic campaign trails!
•–• 23:06, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Just a thing I tried today

This cow urine article was difficult to write. I hope it was not that hard to review. After I saved the page, I decided to do a sanitary check (like how we do after review, pre-publish). I recalled this[1] study which claimed harder to read fonts made it easier to retain for the reader. I right-clicked on the article text, in Inspect element, for .mw-body-content p CSS, I added: font-family: Operator (A font that I have). You can use something like font-family: cursive instead. I don't know if that is something you would find useful or not, but I would be trying that for a few days to see if it makes any difference or not.
•–• 20:46, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

[1]: Elisabeth Donahue. "Font focus: Making ideas harder to read may make them easier to retain" — Princeton University, October 28, 2010

COVID-19 category

Hi Pi zero/Archive 18,

I was surprised to see my recent edit rejected with no explanation. Cheers, Ottawahitech (talk) 23:41, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

@Ottawahitech: Hi. You updated the wikidata link to a category page which acts as an internal wikimedia tracking page. Our categories (Example: CAT:India matches with most of the India pages on sisters) are named for the semantic reason.
•–• 23:44, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Heads up on my next article

Later today (UTC afternoon/evening) I'm going to write a recap of Tuesday 3/17 in the US election. A lot happened: Ohio's primary was delayed, Biden won the other three, and Trump became the presumptive nominee (i.e. got the delegates needed). Just wanted to leave a note. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 05:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)


Hello. Is there any local policy for removing inactive sysops? There are currently 3 admins (Skenmy (t · c · b), Cspurrier (t · c · b) & Brian (t · c · b)) who have been inactive for more than 2 years. Minorax (talk) 14:14, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

We do have a privilege-expiry policy. It does not require us to remove such rights, but does allows us to do so. We often choose to wait longer than the minimal time before removing such privileges. --Pi zero (talk) 15:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Changing the title of an article

How do you change the title of an article? If I can’t, then I would like you to change the title of my article Tom Hanks and his wife catch coronavirus to Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson catch coronavirus and released after five days in the hospital ICameHereForNews (talk) 06:35, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

@ICameHereForNews: If you view the article page in a web browser, while you are logged in, across the top of the page display there should be a line of control tabs. Way over on the right-hand end of that is a drop-down menu. "Rename" should be the one item on that menu; that's what you want to do. --Pi zero (talk) 14:18, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Does it have to be done on Desktop? ICameHereForNews (talk) 21:09, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

@ICameHereForNews: I don't actually know. The mobile view looks to me as if it should work there too, but I don't actually have a mobile device through which to view it. --Pi zero (talk) 21:14, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

I want to....... you something (trying to bestow a bit of privacy pertaining to a source), and for the life of me: I can't remember how to find/send to your preferred email address?-- Bddpaux (talk) 20:18, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

@Bddpaux: I'll send you an email through the wiki platform; that should show you my email address (I think). --Pi zero (talk) 20:20, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
OK, take a look. I have to run across town to my office and anticipate submitting article for review within the next 4 hours. A smidge later than I'd intended but I feel like it is an important article, showing some stuff an American went through before the Coronavirus bomb really dropped across the globe. I need to add a bit more of her Coronavirus self-monitoring stuff (she reports she was only ordered to self monitor, please note-- and has been fine). --Bddpaux (talk) 20:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
I did receive an email from you, related to the article. --Pi zero (talk) 20:47, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
You know, in my opinion: a number of the things she alleges are very important. But: we stick to neutrality here.....a slippery little eel, indeed! There are about 5 more things she alleged (fallout-type stuff etc.) that I could work in, but I just think that would be a bridge too far. I think she is telling the truth, but I have to keep the article (unto itself, on its own two feet) focused....and if I veer too far off, the written word could start sounding a bit sophmoric. --Bddpaux (talk)
I think I've dumped as many of my notes as I've got in there. --Bddpaux (talk) 16:19, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Requested deletion

I nominated Plainrock124 hits 1 million subscribers for deletion because it has no newsworthy element. Could you please delete it? Thanks, ICameHereForNews (talk) 04:37, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Done. Thx. --Pi zero (talk) 04:46, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

closure of korean wikinews proposal

I happened to bump into this proposal at metawiki. It is a proposal to close korean wikinews, a project that apparently has been open but not actice for ten years. I came here to find the announcement urging others to participate in the discussion, but I cannot find it. Help please? Ottawahitech (talk) 14:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

@Ottawahitech: I was unaware of that proposal until less than half a day ago. I don't think we were informed of it. I have a dim memory of being in touch with someone who was trying to do something with Korean Wikinews more recently than ten years ago, however I don't recall details. Very late last night I was trying to catch up with my watchlist on meta and noticed there was something going on with a proposal to close Korean Wikinews, but was unable to focus on it properly since I was barely conscious by that time of night. --Pi zero (talk) 15:26, 22 March 2020 (UTC)


I am sorry to disturb you. User talk:Md Tanbir Islam

@Md Tanbir Islam: I'm happy to help. Feel free to ask. --Pi zero (talk) 17:57, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you.

Please reply on the talk page of First cases of Coronavirus reported in Bangladesh. Md Tanbir Islam (talk) 17:30, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Please tell me what can i do now? I am sorry for my mistake. Please do something. Please.. Md Tanbir Islam (talk) 17:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
I am talking about Four people die of COVID-19 in Bangladesh. Md Tanbir Islam (talk) 17:10, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
@Md Tanbir Islam: Hi. I've noticed the work you've put into the article. A fresh focal event is going to be needed. The effort you've put in can help, in two ways: The things you've learned can help you to avoid past difficulties, hopefully allowing an article to get through the review process while still fresh (which is no small thing; we need writers who have already been through learning these things). And, supposing the material you've already written is verifiable from the cited sources, and not too close to the wording of the sources, it could be folded in to a revision of the article with a new focal event. (I'm being cautious, here; I don't know for sure that the existing material is verifiable and distant, because I haven't yet done an in-depth source-check on it. The government site was down, when I looked a few minutes ago.) --Pi zero (talk) 22:22, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. But now i can't editing that for update. Because maximum information i have written. Thank you Md Tanbir Islam (talk) 00:12, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

You've written all the information you have at the moment? That happens. The moment to refocus and resubmit will be as soon as some new thing becomes available as a focal event, so that we can (hopefully) review and publish the article while it's still fresh. --Pi zero (talk) 00:47, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you so much. Take care and be safe. Md Tanbir Islam (talk) 03:43, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

I didn't understand about (clearly not refocused) Md Tanbir Islam (talk) 18:49, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

@Md Tanbir Islam: Okay, I'll try to explain better.

A Wikinews article is built around a focal event; something specific, relevant, and fresh. The headline, lede, and body of the article should all be oriented around that focal event. The headline tells the most important and unique thing about the focal event. The lede briefly summarizes the focal event. The body works outward from the focal event, providing additional information beyond what the lede said and the supporting details and context. See WN:PILLARS#style, WN:Inverted pyramid.

Atm, the the focus of the article is the fourth confirmed COVID-19 death in Bangladesh. The headline, lede, and body are all about that. An article focused on that event is not fresh. As I'm writing this comment, for an article to be fresh it would have to focus on something much more recent; for example, I think the sixth confirmed COVID-19 death in Bangladesh was confirmed either today or maybe yesterday, which if true would mean it is atm a fresh focus. The article would have to be renamed (thus changing the headline), it would need a lede that summarizes the new focus, and corresponding changes to the body. --Pi zero (talk) 19:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Now i understood that it so much hard for u to review a article. Thank you Md Tanbir Islam (talk) 23:47, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

But you said that, "the headline should be in present tense". Md Tanbir Islam (talk) 04:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

I didn't find any source about the sixth people die of COVID-19 in Bangladesh. So i think that the fourth COVID-19 death confirmed in Bangladesh. Md Tanbir Islam (talk) 04:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

I am sorry to disturb you again. My article is ready for reviewing. Thank you Md Tanbir Islam (talk) 03:58, 3 April 2020 (UTC)


I decided to move Tom Hanks and his wife catch coronavirus to my user space. Please delete the redirect. ICameHereForNews (talk) 01:28, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Well... we don't generally have people userspacing their own articles. I'd like to think about this... --Pi zero (talk) 01:38, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

@Pi zero: see Talk:Tom Hanks and his wife catch coronavirus. ICameHereForNews (talk) 07:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Pi zero, we can delete the article now. ICameHereForNews (talk) 07:28, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Tom Hanks and his wife catch coronavirus

Thanks for deleting this article. Next time, when I hear a story I'm interested in, I will immediately look for sources and if there are enough I will create an article. ICameHereForNews (talk) 00:03, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

This sounds like an excellent idea. May I ask you how you read the news? Do you have a feed reader or preferred sites? Ta. Gryllida (talk) 00:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

@Gryllida: Usually, I just hear it on the news, like on the car, or on the TV. ICameHereForNews (talk) 01:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

I was listening to a lot of news radio when I started here. Sometimes I would draft an article based on what I'd heard and then find written sources for it. That required careful fact-checking, though. Darkfrog24 (talk) 01:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
@ICameHereForNews: If you want, I can help you with the completion of the story. Make sure you ping me. (I will try, but I don't promise it, there are some off-wiki commitments) I know it is hard to see the hard work getting stale and deleted. But the joy of having an article published will help you get over it. I hope you choose to write something soon!.
•–• 01:41, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
@Acagastya: Sadly, the news I just watched had nothing interesting or newsworthy. ICameHereForNews (talk) 02:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
@ICameHereForNews: I understand if you would only prefer writing about the incidents in Australia. However, if there is something else, let me know. Also, I would strongly suggest to make the best effort you can, while writing, so that I can point out where to improve and how to improve.
•–• 02:29, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
How did the connection with Australia enter this discussion? Gryllida (talk) 02:38, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
People tend to write articles about incidents where they live. It is a general trend, but well, if you want, I will strike my comment.
•–• 02:41, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
It wasn't that I would strike it out; more like I didn't know that ICameHereForNews was from the same region. That'd be remarkable (and a pleasant discovery). Gryllida (talk) 05:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

@Acagastya: It wasn't that it wasn't Australian. The real problem was that there was no evidence of it being newsworthy. ICameHereForNews (talk) 02:57, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

@ICameHereForNews: if you don't mind, consider joining #wikinews live connect. You can use something like kiwiirc. There, we can talk about such incidents and what can be done. I think that could be helpful.
•–• 03:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
ICameHereForNews, the "live connect" link above is a one-click entry to the chat. Gryllida (talk) 05:31, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

That link #wikinews is not working. ICameHereForNews (talk) 02:05, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

click on live, @ICameHereForNews:
•–• 02:08, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
I’m still having trouble with it.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by ICameHereForNews (talkcontribs)
@ICameHereForNews: Okay, go to [4], click on "Add a network", in "Server", type "", click on connect,, in "Send a message", type "/j #wikinews-en".
•–• 02:16, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Okey dokey..........., things have fallen into a bit of an odd stasis 'round here. Let's just chalk it up to the bizarre state of the solar system right now! Any-hoo, there is a TEENY chance I can maybe crank out some smidge of a synthesis article about the pandemic while maybe folding a spoonful of my interview article into that? Your thoughts?? Admittedly: I had wanted my article to bring forward a bit more of 'An American in China at the start of the big mess' feel, but kinda failed in that bad. It ultimately wound up as: An American was working in China and had a bad jerk for a co-worker and her Chinese boss didn't care, nor did a bunch of other people. Oh: and a bad virus thing started while she was there too. I just think there is a drip or a drop in there that could add value to our larger project here if I can figure out where it might stick....?! --Bddpaux (talk) 22:16, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

My talk page

Would you please unhide the revisions on my talk page? Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 23:03, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

@DannyS712: it was an IP spam, who was talking about a reverted edit on incubator's AN, if that information helps.
•–• 23:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Sure, but I'd prefer if it wasn't hidden --DannyS712 (talk) 23:12, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

keeping spam on-wiki?
•–• 23:13, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

It was reverted, so it wouldn't be visible unless people go looking --DannyS712 (talk) 23:19, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
@DannyS712: Although I can sympathize with dislike of having a hidden revision in one's talk page history, the LTA involved here cross-links spam revisions directly. Admins on various projects within the sisterhood have therefore taken to hiding their revisions so the revisions can't be weaponized. --Pi zero (talk) 00:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I am familiar with the LTA in question. Is there a policy on wikinews regarding revision deletion that I can refer to? --DannyS712 (talk) 00:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I feel I'd be better able to help, with all this, if I understood where you're coming from. As far as policy on revision deletion, I don't know of an en.wn policy specific to that. From what I understand, it's essentially a form of deletion. We delete spam all the time. We don't usually trouble ourselves with deleting individual revisions, of course, but that's a matter of doing less when there's no particular good-of-the-community motive to do more. --Pi zero (talk) 01:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I prefer to be able to read my talk page history in its entirety, and I see no compelling reason for the deletion; per Wikinews:Etiquette#Principles of Wikinews etiquette, "Avoid reverts and deletions whenever possible" - the revert makes sense, but the deletion can be avoided. If the only relevant policy is the general deletion policy, I don't see any reason for deleting text that has already been reverted (if it was a copyright violation, outing, etc. that is a different issue and deletion is called for) --DannyS712 (talk) 01:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Linking to specific revisions renders reversion irrelevant; one can then no longer reason that "it's been reverted, so it's gone". In that case, each unhidden spam revision is the spammer successfully using the wiki as a web host. --Pi zero (talk) 02:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I understand that revisions can be linked to directly, but I would still like to have the revisions restored --DannyS712 (talk) 02:50, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Any spam should not be visible. If it is a newly created page, one deletes it: because it is almost impossible to convert that to a genuine article. Else, if it is a revision, it is to be hidden from the public. Regardless of the page, one can't keep spam visible to the public.
•–• 02:55, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

I'm confused: you start with "should not be visible" and end with "one can't keep spam visible to the public". If its "can't", it is incorrect, because it is fairly simple to keep visible. If it is should, I do not believe the revision deletion performed here is authorized by any wikinews community consensus. If you would like to open a discussion at Wikinews:Water cooler/policy, or start a thread at Wikinews:Deletion requests for the revision in question, that would be fine, but please restore the history of my talk page --DannyS712 (talk) 04:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I don’t know why are you confused. "Any spam should not be visible" is a goal. Anyone who has the mop and the bucket can not keep it visible to the public, because that goes against the goal. Deleting the spam is a perfectly valid reason. Think of it like this: "Injustice shouldn't happen". "One can not let injustice to happen". Can injustice happen? Yes. But one should not let it happen. If you have a good reason to point why one should go against the DR of spam, and UDEL the revision, please state it clearly. And then, we can proceed.
•–• 04:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Its hard to present a good reason without knowing what the content was. Also, I'd prefer if I could have this discussion with Pi zero, as the admin who made the deletion. --DannyS712 (talk) 04:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Pi zero is not here, at the moment. And spam calls for an admin action.
•–• 05:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I don't mind waiting until Pi zero is next online; its not urgent --DannyS712 (talk) 06:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

The objective of most spam is to cause the spammed material to be visible in the default view of a page, which in turn causes the material to become listed by internet search engines. Reversion foils that objective, therefore reversion suffices — for most spam. The spam in this case is not of that sort; the LTA clearly expects to be reverted, and weaponizes still-accessible revisions containing it regardless of their not being the topmost revisions on those pages. Part of the LTA's evident objective is to create a toxic tangled inter-linking mess of such edits. For that, they don't need those revisions to be topmost. They only have to link into the ugly snarl of revisions, which they can do from outside the sisterhood. If we leave those revisions accessible, we are allowing the wikis to be exploited to web-host parts of the spam-snarl. Hiding the revisions cuts off the disease vectors, one by one. There is a compelling community interest in hiding such revisions. Thus far, I'm not aware of a reason with significant weight to un-hide the revision. I'm unclear on the reason for the request, if there's more to it than a perception that a hidden revision in the page history is untidy (which I actually do sympathize with, as remarked earlier, but it's a small thing in the larger picture of the situation). --Pi zero (talk) 13:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)


Hi, on your talk page, there is a list of archives of your talk page. How do I add that to my talk page? ICameHereForNews (talk) 03:22, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

@ICameHereForNews: At the top of my talk page, I transclude a subpage, using code {{/archive}}. The subpage contains the verbose wiki markup to format that neat table of dated archives, at User talk:Pi zero/archive. --Pi zero (talk) 03:40, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Prepping Article on Global Ceasefire

Dear Pi Zero,

I am putting together an article for a future event (so no references yet), for which I have obtained an advance quote (OR) with email chain substantiation. Would you please check and advise on this OR aspect of the article at: ?

Thank you! Johncdraper (talk) 12:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)


The story regarding the American stranded in Africa. Why is that not a newsworthy story? and the most recent story published about it was just yesterday April 17th in a major new york city news outlet. I believe the subject is both newsworthy and updates on the story are recent especially with the new attention of the virus now reaching Africa and an estimated 300,000 could die. why wouldn't the story of someone there not be considered newsworthy? the subject is also receiving national attention abroad. Would it be ok if I asked for a second opinion and you not be the only judge and jury on the story? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NanaKofiER (talkcontribs) 16:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Please see Wikinews:Newsworthiness. --Pi zero (talk) 17:52, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

thank you for your time NanaKofiER (talk) 14:21, 19 April 2020 (UTC)


Thank you for being patient... NanaKofiER (talk) 20:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Press conference of the Chairman of the Union of Oil and Gas Producers of Russia Yuri Shafranik

Sorry, I was already reviewing it and didn’t see your intervening edits. I should have put an {{under review}} but I thought it wouldn’t take more than a couple of minutes to write the things still needed. --Green Giant (talk) 16:46, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

@Green Giant: I'm most grateful. Hadn't gotten into it yet, and it's as well I don't have to atm since each separate such thing one immerses oneself in uses up some of one's mind's daily allocation of elasticity.

I've been on both sides of that didn't-think-the-review-comments-would-take-so-long-to-write effect. I've been thinking (for some time now, which just shows how slowly the tool development is going) that the eventual replacement for the review gadget should automatically put {{under review}} on the page when one starts up the assistant, and should also check at that time whether the article has been marked under review, which should eliminate virtually all collisions. --Pi zero (talk) 16:55, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Talk:Stores in Australia lower toilet paper limits per transaction#Request

Could you see this? ICameHere ForNews 03:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Please help me to publish this

{{editprotected}} —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Abhialmish (talkcontribs) 07:42, 3 May 2020‎ (UTC)


Hi I'm on mobile so maybe I should request articles. Carloswasskins (talk) 22:48, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


All of my other objections to the moves of my prepared stories not withstanding, can you please leave a redirect behind when moving such pages to avoid breaking links to the drafts (like the ones displayed prominently at the top of my user page)? Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 00:08, 21 May 2020 (UTC)


Can you please delete L? Thanks--ValeJappo (talk) 19:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

And A. And maybe, can you block (talk) 19:40, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
@Acagastya: I see that he is online--ValeJappo (talk) 19:40, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Tracking cats

Hi, can you please create tracking cats for the form of interviews? Namely, video, audio, phone, email, in-person-based. Overlapping is okay.
•–• 10:50, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Can do. Will put some thought into it (to get it right). --Pi zero (talk) 12:26, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Most of the machinery is in place; what remains is to create the specific subcategories, then add media parameters to all the {{interview}} calls. --Pi zero (talk) 06:40, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Subcats created. Which leaves "only" classifying the 494 interviews. --Pi zero (talk) 07:47, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you, pizero. This really helps! :D. However, is it possible the template gives a warning if someone says "medium" instead of "media", or "e-mail" instead of "email"? I think one can blunder there. (Also, the tracking cats don't show up in the categories section as hidden cats -- it will be better if they did, so that I don't have to click edit to see if they were categorised or not.
•–• 08:50, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Medium vs media should be very easy to do.
  • Aliases for the names of particular media, I really should have thought of, they're obviously needed, but will take just a bit more machinery.
  • I should lightly rearrange those categories to use template {{tracking category}}.
--Pi zero (talk) 13:08, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
medium should now work as an alias for media. --Pi zero (talk) 13:36, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
What I'm doing atm is simply supporting those things as alternatives, which is less elegant, perhaps, that warning about them. Oh well. --Pi zero (talk) 16:35, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
It now supports "e-mail" as an alias for "email". Can support other alias, but just that one atm. --Pi zero (talk) 18:42, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, pizero. I was Actually thinking email should be an alias of text -- for example facebook messenger in this case: Talk:Tim Curry, TV premiere screenings, cosplay feature at Fan Expo Canada.
•–• 07:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

On considered inspection, these appear not to be suitable for {{tracking category}}, as tracking categories are transitory (may be empty at any given time), whereas interview-media categories are presumably permanent. So I guess I won't be adding {{tracking category}} after all.

You are suggesting, I take it, that we should add an interview-medium text and remove email, aliasing email (and e-mail) to text? --Pi zero (talk) 11:56, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Here's what I'd suggest.
  • To add text:
  • Additions to {{interview/media}} (without removing anything): add text to the list of interview-media; add to the list of aliases ("email" "text"), ("e-mail" "text"), and perhaps ("irc" "text") and others as deemed appropriate.
  • Once text is added to the list, an error message should appear at {{interview/media}} with a link to create the new subcat. So, create it. Once the text subcat exists, it may start to populate automatically.
  • Make sure all the articles in the email subcat are also in the text subcat before proceeding further; if they aren't, a null edit to each article —making no change, just saving the edit panel unaltered— should cause the wiki platform to update the categorization of each article.
  • There's no technical difficulty with having both a text subcat and one or more subs thereof. Each sub, such as email, would be populated and the alias would guarantee that the text parent is also populated. If we wish to remove the email sub, after the text subcat is fully populated, we'd remove email from the list of interview-media at {{interview/media}} (the alias can and perhaps should be left in place), make sure it get fully depopulated (automatically or with null edits), and delete the email subcat once empty.
--Pi zero (talk) 13:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
I've added text and irc, with suitable aliases. Last I looked, the system appeared to be in the process of populating the text subcat. --Pi zero (talk) 16:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)


Hello, I am new to wikinews and unsure about the proper way to use comments. Seems in this case that it is powered both by javascript, meaning javascript is required to use comments (bad idea in my opinion). It should also be questioned why the HTML comment says "Leave this line alone. Add comments below." if the correct thing is not to add comments below, but to exit the edit interface entirely and use the javascript in the Read UI. It might be better to state that, or, better yet, have some type of abuse filter that prevents editing those pages entirely. Naleksuh (talk) 13:37, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, @Naleksuh: There should be a big button nearly the top of the comments page that says "Start a new discussion"; you're supposed to click on that button. I'm not sure whether that, specifically, requires javascript, but I don't think the wikimedia sites work very well without javascript; iirc even logging in to wikimedia, as it's supposed to function, expects javascript to be enabled. Certainly Wikinews has various important automation that won't work without it; just for instance, when a draft article is ready to be submitted for review, the primary way to do that is to click on the "Submit for review" button on the article's {{develop}} tag, and that button isn't available without javascript. --Pi zero (talk) 13:56, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Nah I frequently disable javascript in my web browser both as a web developer and because sketchy paywalls, and I appreciate that wikipedia has almost zero difference. The only differences are that the dialog on Special:Contributions and Special:Log are different. Other than that it's exactly the same. I even opted out of the javascript interface on recent changes because I prefer the regular one better. But Wikinews is very extensive in javascript in adding its own virtual features, which I can understand as its a good way to do so without direct server access, however, with the number of websites that abuse it regularly, it would not be uncommon to see it disabled.
It might be a good idea to clarify in the edit comment that comments are not added via editing the page and / or prevent such pages from being edited from non-admins via some type of edit filter.
Also, it appears that 99% of the pages on Special:Random are archived. Is there any way to see "fresh" pages only?
Thanks for information about Wikinews and comments so far, has been helpful in getting the situation sorted out, will hopefully edit here even more in the coming days Naleksuh (talk) 14:04, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
I completely sympathize on the problems of javascript. When I'm reviewing, which requires me to access all the sources of the article I'm reviewing, I use a different browser just so I can work with javascript turned off by default, only whitelisted for certain sites — including Wikinews, because we have a large amount of automation here all dependent on javascript. News sites tend to abuse javascript, and some of them —not even malicious ones as such— are among the most appallingly heavy javascript sites I've seen (I've had my browser crash on contact with some of them). It is, actually, politically impossible for us to move all our automation inside the wiki platform so it wouldn't use javascript; the Wikimedia Foundation jealously hoards centralized control of such things (just as well I not get started on a rant about that). The bottom line is, there is no alternative to using javascript for needed customizations, and Wikinews relies especially heavily on these sorts of customizations; in fact, we'd never have survived this long without our key customized automations, and we need more than we now have and are constantly working to create more (not more javascript, necessarily; my own efforts are to provide a minimal set of javascript tools whose purpose is to empower doing everything else in wiki markup).

Almost all of the articles on en.wn are fully protected; a news article is a snapshot in time, and our archives of such snapshots, preserved and displayed under glass as it were, going back about fifteen years, are a huge asset (in multiple senses). We always keep at least ten most-recently-published articles unprotected (though our archive policy kicks in, prohibiting further substantive changes, 24 hours after publication), as samples of our output; these are displayed on our main page. --Pi zero (talk) 14:37, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Not just javascript in general, but also that content is added via the read interface is a bit confusing in general, for those familiar with wikis but not with wikinews. Not a huge deal as I understand now, but confusing at first.
I am aware of the archive policy, but I mean if there is any way to get any random non-archived article. "No" is a fine answer here, just that the current Random function seems rather useless Naleksuh (talk) 06:35, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

@Naleksuh: On the main page, you can see a list of the links which are not archived -- anything older that those are archived.
•–• 06:36, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Also, recent changes shows that an IP edited Talk:"University_of_Queensland" even though that page does not exist anymore, it was moved to Talk:University_of_Queensland. Is this another wikinews feature, or just a mediawiki bug? Naleksuh (talk) 06:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Neither a feature, nor a bug. If you create foo and then someone moves it to bar without leaving a redirect -- it is not purged from the RC.
•–• 06:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
It is on other wikis though Naleksuh (talk) 06:50, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

that is how mediawiki is supposed to work.
•–• 06:52, 2 June 2020 (UTC)


Why are there no Checkusers on Wikinews? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ICameHereForNews (talkcontribs) 02:34, 4 June 2020‎ (UTC)

What you want there is four tidles: ~~~~

We always went to great effort to make sure we had our own checkusers. However, the Foundation does not allow a project to have just one local checkuser, on the theory that it's too much power for one person to hold without a second person to act as a check on them; so if a project has only two, and one of them loses their checkuser status, the Foundation suspends the other as well. It's my impression that on Wikipedia, if a checkuser appears to be inactive, they're likely to receive a polite inquiry; but, whether that's so or not, it certainly isn't the Foundation's attitude toward small wikis, so when one of our two checkusers was seen to be over the line on inactivity, they yanked both our CUs without attempting to be polite to anyone. --Pi zero (talk) 02:57, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

So is there anyway they could be brought back? ICameHere ForNews 05:55, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Yes, by writing two nominations for local CUs. I think this is work in progress. --Gryllida (talk) 06:09, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Who can give users checkuser rights? ICameHere ForNews 23:39, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Technically, I believe, Stewards. The Foundation perceives, I think, a legal concern with the handling of private information by CUs, hence the various constraints on the voting process etc. --Pi zero (talk) 00:15, 13 June 2020 (UTC)


There was a bit of a scare this week, and it looked like LiquidThreads might break. It looks like it's going to be okay this time after all, and it may (hopefully) hang on for years, but it's reminded me that it's really just one catastrophic bug away from an unscheduled removal. Do you have any preference for its (eventual) replacement? Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:33, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

I've been hoping to eventually replace LQT with something using dialog. My development of dialog-based semi-automated assistants is really difficult development that has been moving even more slowly than I'd hoped, and I was already figuring it would take several years. But I'll put some thought to perhaps prioritizing that particular application of it.

Several years ago, with the Foundation pushing Flow especially at the time, we had a community discussion here on this subject. Though LQT breaking was not something we discussed then. Key take-aways from that, as I recall, were that  (1) Flow sucks, and  (2) although LQT is something we all kind of love to hate, and everyone was very clear that wiki markup is what talk pages should always be, for the peculiar function of opinions pages LQT is actually a great improvement over the old wiki-based talk pages. We had, I remember, a project veteran who recalled that in the Before Time, when our opinions pages were straight wiki pages, we were forever pouring effort into fixing misformatted comments — because, of course, writing discussion comments is a moderate-level use of wiki markup, not something likely to go smoothly for someone with zero prior experience of wiki markup, which is a common case for the opinions page of a news article.

@Bawolff: Any thoughts on this? --Pi zero (talk) 01:10, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Its not like flow is being developed anymore either (Or is it? Was always pretty ambigious what the state is). I guess i don't work here anymore so i can be a bit more frank in my views on flow. I personally like LQT better than flow, although flow could probably reasonable replace LQT for the opinions page use case (flow is more polished but misunderstanding use cases. I think it suffered from unclear vision statement and pivoting to different visions through its development, well at the same time being opinionated in its design decisions. After all it was originally envisioned as a facebook walltype feature or maybe something similar to say Asana's "inbox" feature, which is very different from a talk page. LQT is hacky and ugly, but very flexible and more suited for wiki workflows). I appreciate the maintenance problem is critical, although translatewiki still uses it, perhaps that will direct the minimum of maintenance required. Beyond that, not sure what to say. If LQT dies then it dies and we'll have to move to something. There's no obvious candidate right now, so unless its death is imminent i guess i would say don't worry about things that might be that you don't have the power to change. Bawolff 08:14, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Flow hasn't been in active development for years. The Product department has declined all requests to have more wikis use it. Maybe they'd rather have more Flow, if it meant removing LQT from the servers, but I think they'd rather turn everything into plain wikitext pages. I don't think that Dialog has been considered at all. I don't know if you've looked at the mw:Talk pages project/replying tool and the related work on starting new discussions, but it should reduce the misformatted-comments problem.
It looks like there's no emergency here, but please keep it in mind. No software lasts forever, so someday we'll need to figure out a replacement for LQT. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 17:55, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
I've been gently suggesting for years that everything should be done in ordinary wiki text, on the theory that there's not much point in having an idea and not sharing it with others. Using wiki text for everything is also what dialog is about, of course: supporting interactive pages through ordinary wiki markup. (It's both easier and harder that one might think, as I've been discovering these past several years.) The idea of facilitating reply is something I've had in mind for dialog, and may well have mentioned to someone at the WMF at some point; I was heartened to note recently the Foundation is doing something of that nature, though I've been plenty busy with my own thing and haven't yet taken time out to study what they're up to. --Pi zero (talk) 18:47, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
The newest version finally reached (five of) the wikis. Click on and try it out. Local testing at any wiki should be enabled soon-ish (maybe this week's train). Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:35, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Can you help?

An editor by the name of "Vote (X) for Change" has been globally locked. It made 35 edits ten years ago on en:wp. It has zero edits on commons but has been indefinitely blocked there. On en:wp "Vote (X) for Change"'s talk page access was restored in 2016 but was revoked again one minute later. This seems unduly harsh, while the global lock is indefensible. How can these actions be reversed? 2A00:23C5:E117:6100:81C9:C123:97E8:D24A (talk) 15:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

There's a page at meta about how to appeal global locks. --Pi zero (talk) 17:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
The following log entry appears on that page:

20:48, 15 July 2018 Trijnstel talk contribs changed protection level for Steward requests/Global [Edit=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) (Persistent vandalism: let's make this indefinite, no reason to keep this open for anons) (hist)

What does the appellant do now? 2A00:23C5:E117:6100:4CDB:9C90:9664:4A9B (talk) 18:26, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Send an email to stewards at wikimedia dot org and explain why the lock should be lifted. --Green Giant (talk) 15:24, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
The editor doesn't have email. Any request would be directed to you as you performed the lock. The relevant page states:

As a general rule, global locks happen almost always in clear-cut situations


  • Accounts that have been used only for vandalism or abuse on multiple wikis and are actively vandalizing now or obviously are otherwise being disruptive on multiple wikis are candidates for a global lock.

Can you please explain the reasoning that led you to perform the lock? 2A00:23C5:E117:6100:9180:E6F5:51C7:3E2F (talk) 17:40, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Please carry on this discussion on the wiki where this happened. Neither this project, nor the page is appropriate for this discussion.
•–• 17:44, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Discussion transferred to Green Giant's en:wp talkpage

2000 vs 2020

Hello, really 2000 at MediaWiki:Sitenotice and related pages?--MrJaroslavik (talk) 20:53, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

@MrJaroslavik: "2000 UTC" means 8 pm UTC. It has nothing to do with the year.
•–• 21:04, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Oh sorry. Why here is not 20:00 UTC?--MrJaroslavik (talk) 21:06, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
@MrJaroslavik: See WN:TIME "Use a colon to separate the hours and minutes, except when using Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) when no separator is to be used."
•–• 21:33, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020

Hi, pizero. You have been elected as this season's ArbCom member. Congratulations! The new term will begin on August 4.
•–• 23:25, 30 July 2020 (UTC)


It's actually cross-wiki promo. See Special:CentralAuth/নাজিম খান --Minorax (talk) 13:17, 7 August 2020 (UTC)


Hi Pi. Would I be correct if I update Template:Source/pub/doc to say "pubtarget" is the correct name of the parameter instead of "target" and that it is optional, not required? I can update it if yes, or maybe it's simpler if you do it when you look at it. Cheers, --SVTCobra 23:04, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

It looks like I read the documentation incorrectly, however, how to use "pubtarget" didn't seem obvious to me. Cheers, --SVTCobra 23:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
I've tried to improve it a bit. --Pi zero (talk) 23:49, 11 August 2020 (UTC)


Did Freenode go down, I can't seem to reconnect. --SVTCobra 02:00, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Well, I can't seem to stay connected for more than 2 minutes. I am done with IRC for the night. --SVTCobra 02:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

From my perspective, it looked like you dropped out of irc three times in rapid succession (and stayed gone the third time). --Pi zero (talk) 02:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Yes, I gave up. Bedtime is coming soon anyway. --SVTCobra 02:39, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Fixing stuff

Hi, I plan to fix the pages listed in Special:LintErrors but every other page is protected. Fixing them won't have any visible changes so it's within the archival policy. Any advice on what I should do? --Minorax (talk) 09:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

@Minorax: Thank you for offering help. And yes, fixing lint errors do not violate archive policy. But only admins will be able to fix it.  :-/
•–• 09:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
@Acagastya: But that'll just create more work for sysops if I were to place {{editprotected}} on every other talk page. --Minorax (talk) 10:51, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
@Minorax: It is supposed to be done my admins. If you place editprotected, it is going to be "nagging" -- but sometimes, nagging gets the work done. I might do it once my exams are over.
•–• 13:26, 12 August 2020 (UTC)


....with the combination of my sabbatical and COVID-brain....I'm a bit fuzzy. What is sighting unpublished articles?? --Bddpaux (talk) 20:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Somehow or other, in association with your edit to the unpublished COVID article, you ended up sighting it. I think it happens because of some sort of procedural confusion that results in clicking an "accept" button at a moment when one shouldn't, which iirc happened once (upon a time) even to me. See: log. --Pi zero (talk) 20:39, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
OK, I think I get it. --Bddpaux (talk) 14:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Lint errors..

Most of the errors I am finding in mainspace are due to 'cosmetic' formatting issues in the input parameters to templates.

So I'd appreciate some review of what I've already attempted repairs on... with some hints on where I might reasonably focus attention. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:20, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

I've got a lot of stuff that needs doing "immediately", or I'd be keeping up with your edits as you make them. I've been mostly making sure, as you go, that if I don't get to checking your edits immediately, they at least show up in pending edits at Category:Review so I'll be able to find them as time permits. --Pi zero (talk) 13:52, 24 August 2020 (UTC)


Code review requested. I didn't want to raise an {{editprotected}} until I was sure the code was correct.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:33, 9 September 2020 (UTC) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:33, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

I'll take a look when I get a chance (perhaps in a few hours). The Howdy template is a sensitive issue, though: It's transcluded, not subst'd, on some humongous number of talk pages, I think last I checked it was well over a million, as a result of which we tend not to make tweaks to it; and we'd really like to redesign it, if we could work out just how to do that — we did redesign it a few years ago but it didn't help the way we'd hoped it would. --Pi zero (talk) 13:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


I requested a news. Cudderizbak (talk) 04:10, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

@Cudderizbak: I see that. Some thoughts.
  • There's clearly some sort of news event there. Perhaps the event is a Nobel prize nomination. It's obviously being used as a publicity stunt by the pro-Trump faction, but Wikinews neutrality policy would not allow us to present it that way. I suspect the two sources you cite might not provide enough breadth of perspective to assemble a neutral presentation.
  • It strikes me as very likely we would need one or more non-US sources, because most sources within the US would be either pro-Trump or anti-Trump, and besides the propagandist approach of pro-Trump sources, the anti-Trump sources would be likely to just ignore the story, depriving us of an alternative perspective.
  • Such an article ought to offer our readers some minimal perspective on the relatively significance (or lack thereof) of nominations for such a Nobel prize.
  • I, personally, would not get involved in writing such an article, because I'd need to keep myself available to review it, and our review policy only allows me to review an article if I'm not a co-author.
--Pi zero (talk) 14:57, 12 September 2020 (UTC)


Is wikinews dying, not much activity of late??? Crupzons (talk) 21:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC) China fishing will it be deleted I hope not. Crupzons (talk) 21:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

  • About the article, I left a note on your user talk. I could set up some of the peripheral structure on that article page for a developing article, but perhaps instead you'd like to re-start the article under a different name using one of our article creation forms (such as the one at WN:WRITE)?
  • Wikinews is definitely going through a slow period. We're busy doing things internally for the long-term benefit of the project, but our output is low. I try to be available every day for review, which is crucial —that there always be someone available when someone does submit something for review— but there hasn't been much submitted for review lately (although, after a very slow week, suddenly two things have been submitted within the past day and are now clamoring for my attention; I expect to be busy on those in upcoming hours).
--Pi zero (talk) 22:02, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Page move

Hey, I edited the Debate Cancellation article to reflect your advice. Would you be able to move the page so that the title specifies the country and/or presidential candidates? Thanks! The Irate Communist (talk) 00:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

@The Irate Communist: Well, I tried a rather unimaginative change to just tip in the additional info. It's been suggested to me to further drop the word "presidential". If you have thoughts on improving this headline, please do suggest. Before publication, we can just rename it; after publication, though we don't like to rename post-publication (it causes duplicate entries in some news feeds), we can still discuss alternatives and learn for the future. --Pi zero (talk) 00:51, 11 October 2020 (UTC)


What should I write that goes by wn guidelines??? HazzerardRavens (talk) 22:17, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

@HazzerardRavens: I suggest first reading through Wikinews:Pillars of writing, which is a compact overview of what we do here. Then, for how to write a first article, there's an excellent tutorial at Wikinews:Writing an article, and there's also an experimental Wikinews:Article wizard. --Pi zero (talk) 22:27, 17 October 2020 (UTC)


Am I dreaming or was there an article about ransomwhere in the queue? If it is still around I just came across in case anyone is interested. Regards, Ottawahitech (talk) 04:10, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

I don't remember something queued on that topic. It's a current news-event, certainly, viable focus for an article. --Pi zero (talk) 04:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Can't add a comment to published page

Just to let you know: Comments:On the campaign trail in the USA, September 2020. cheers, Ottawahitech (talk) 17:39, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

@Ottawahitech: What exactly did you try to do, and how did it fail? --Pi zero (talk) 17:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, I cannot remember. Ottawahitech (talk) 19:00, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

I made a small typo at Comments:Conservative_groups_hold_rally_in_Washington_D.C._claiming_U.S._elections_were_stolen_from_President_Trump#A_quote_from_this_article_was_added_to_wikiquote_10553, but I don't see an edit button to correct it. Cheers, Ottawahitech (talk) 18:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ottawahitech: At the lower right of your comment, there should be a drop-down menu, with an item on it "edit this page". --Pi zero (talk) 18:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks I edited the page in question. warning: I'll probably forget this tip by the time I visit here again, so may have to impose on you a second(third?) time. Ottawahitech (talk) 19:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello pizero

I'm unblocked now, thanks to stewards. Talk to you later. FcoonerBCA (talk) 23:31, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

o/ --Pi zero (talk) 23:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)


Very much thanks for your knowledge, pls inform me more regarding this. Shirpaaal (talk) 15:12, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Not deleting collaboration pages of deleted articles?

Hi Pi zero/Archive 18 I happened to see this proposal and was wondering if wikinews is still considering not deleting collaboration pages of deleted articles. Thanks in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 18:58, 26 December 2020 (UTC) btw I was not warned I was not logged in a minute agoOttawahitech (talk) 18:59, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

@Ottawahitech: We delete talk pages of deleted articles, almost always. (I can only think of one exception, where a user's behavior had been so vile that the community permanently banned them from the project, and we undeleted one article talk page to provide a publicly visible sample.) We've discussed the drawbacks of loosing the feedback discussions, which I've found to be a mixed curse because sometimes it's a relief to everyone to let unpleasant exchanges be buried with the failed article they were about (most times, if an article has such an exchange on its talk page, it doesn't get published); but, because letting go of such unpleasantness can be such a boon, we've never settled on a specific concrete proposal for what to do differently in this regard. --Pi zero (talk) 19:24, 26 December 2020 (UTC)


Hi Pi zero/Archive 18

Just wanted to bring a small item to your attention: I was checking for interesting articles about Covid, but I didn't see one of the covid articles now displayed on the mainpage: Chilean authorities report first COVID-19 outbreak in Antarctica under the heading Latest stories.

Bye till next time Ottawahitech (talk) 01:07, 27 December 2020 (UTC) Happy Holidays Ottawahitech (talk) 01:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

@Ottawahitech: The server cache just needed to be updated. You can do that yourself; on each such category page, just under the heading Latest stories and before the list of recent articles, there's a line that says "Refresh this list to see the latest articles." The words "Refresh this list" are a clickable link, and if you click it, it causes the server to purge its cache of the page, thus refreshing the list. --Pi zero (talk) 01:26, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Happy Holidays, Ottawahitech. :D --Pi zero (talk) 01:35, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Also, many thanks for reviewing the story. Gryllida (talk) 02:35, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

And the trophy for you too

I, Acagastya, hereby award Pi zero this Wikinews Trophy for going through so many (!!!) original reports and publishing them. Without pi, none of this could have been achieved.

Sincere thanks. --Pi zero (talk) 18:29, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

I need help

Sir i need to know something , i have been blocked for editing in wikipedia , i was new to wikipedia and i edited an article and i didn't submit reference i didn't know it was important but now i learned and henceforth i will be careful when editing , please tell me what do i do if i am blocked so i can be unblocked i will really be grateful if you can help thank you. Gosego Nkwadzile (talk) 16:05, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

With respect, you were not blocked on Wikipedia for failing to cite a source. You were blocked on grounds of being clearly not there to write an encyclopedia. I haven't gotten the impression, from your edits on Wikinews so far, that you're here to write news, either. If you wish to get unblocked on Wikipedia, I suggest you need first change your attitude and demonstrate (on some project where you aren't blocked; Wikinews is one, but there are others if Wikinews isn't a good fit for you) that you can pull yourself together and be an upstanding contributor, and then after a while perhaps you can request, with suitable sobriety, to be unblocked on Wikipedia, using your scrupulous behavior elsewhere as evidence you have adopted a serious and productive attitude. --Pi zero (talk) 16:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank yo Gosego Nkwadzile (talk) 16:34, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you sir Gosego Nkwadzile (talk) 16:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

I need help

Please give me the rules of wiki news I don't wanna get blocked again I wanna follow the standards accordingly. Moatlhodi Nkwadzile (Jutas) (talk) 18:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

I suggest
--Pi zero (talk) 18:05, 8 January 2021 (UTC)


Hi @Pi zero:, I created an article called Twitter permanently bans President Trump from using their app, then I found that there’s another undeveloped article about the same topic. What should I do? Thanks in advance, -ElfSnail123 (talk) 13:56, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

@ElfSnail123: In this case, looks like no harm done since the other article —I think you're talking about Trump's Twitter account permanently suspended— has no actual content written. We might put a note at the top of the other article directing people to yours. (And I have fallen behind on review and have to launch a major effort today...) --Pi zero (talk) 14:28, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you very much! That’s exactly the article I was talking about. -ElfSnail123 (talk) 14:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


Hi, Pi Zero .... I am just new in wikipedia ...thank for the guidance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pooja Shree Gaur (talkcontribs) 04:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Contributing to Wikinews is a learned skill; it can take a while to get the hang of it, after which things hopefully get much easier. We try to help folks up that steep initial learning curve. Feel free to ask questions, and please don't get discouraged if your first attempt, though a learning experience, doesn't actually succeed in reaching publication. --Pi zero (talk) 04:49, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

You need to block links to anon/new users users

Seriously. The benefit easily outweigh the risks. Using wb's abuse filter would be enough. Leaderboard (talk) 20:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

@Leaderboard: I'm not sure what you're recommending to do. --Pi zero (talk) 20:03, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Use en.wb's abuse filter, that automatically blocks all edits that contain external links that are under 2 edits. If it's really a false positive, redirect them to a suitable place. This is done on mw and wikibooks and works quite well. Leaderboard (talk) 20:04, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Seems like a terrible thing to do. If the think you have described work the way it is said, it could be easily misused, and frankly sounds terrible for a wiki. (talk) 20:06, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
I cannot confirm this from the two wikis I monitor at least. Especially in MW, the spam dropped drastically once that filter was implemented. Leaderboard (talk) 20:08, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
(or at least import the filter and set it to log-only. That will give you a good indication on the reliability here) Leaderboard (talk) 20:13, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
@Leaderboard: We kicked around that idea here once years ago, and after a bit of thought we realized it's really a non-starter for news: however well it might work on some wikis, when writing a news article often the first thing you should do is set up source citations, which usually have to be external links. --Pi zero (talk) 20:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

This ain't Kansas. Without links to external sites, how would you imagine a news article would be written here? MW and WB doesn't need many external links, but that is not the case on wn. (talk) 20:22, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Admin activity review

Looks like Stewards are starting to flex their muscles, at least according to Wikiquote:Village_pump#IMPORTANT:_Admin_activity_review. Have not seen a similar posting at WN. Cheers, Ottawahitech (talk) 18:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ottawahitech: En.wn has an inactivity policy, and has had it in place for many years now. --Pi zero (talk) 18:48, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Pi zero/Archive 18".