Ottawahitech
This page can be found at Q:en:User:Ottawahitech.
English Wikinews pageviews topviews analysis edit
Link to Abandoned stories edit
About my interests edit
About wikinews edit
English wikinews as of 04 19, 2024
| Statistics | ||
| Articles | 21,958 | |
| Pages | 2,893,142 | |
| Registered users | 2,872,832 | |
| Active users | 162 | |
| Patrollers | 0 | |
| Rollbackers | 0 | |
| Administrators | 16 | |
| Bureaucrats | 3 | |
| CheckUsers | 2 | |
| Oversighters | 0 | |
| Arbitrators | 6 | |
Note1: original wikicode was lifted from User:A Den Jentyl Ettien Avel Dysklyver on Simple English wikipedia (sorry I forget the code)
Note2: the last entry must be updated manually (I think?)
List of Wikinews Administrators edit
List of Wikinews reviewers edit
- Acagastya talk contribs
- Bawolff talk contribs
- Bddpaux talk contribs
- Blood Red Sandman talk contribs
- Chaetodipus talk contribs
- Cromium talk contribs
- Developer Sock One talk contribs
- Developer Sock Three talk contribs
- Developer Sock Two talk contribs
- Gopher65 talk contribs
- Gryllida talk contribs
- Heavy Water talk contribs
- JJLiu112 talk contribs
- LivelyRatification talk contribs
- Microchip08 talk contribs
- RockerballAustralia talk contribs
- SVTCobra talk contribs
- ShakataGaNai talk contribs
- Tom Morris talk contribs
- Tyrol5 talk contribs
- William S. Saturn talk contribs
COVID-19: data tracking no more edit
Did you know that w:John Hopkins University (JHU) stop tracking w:COVID-19 pandemic data? Apparently this happened very quietely on March 10, 2023 according to a posting on their website dated February 10.
The is all I found on enwp in regards to COVID tracking at JHU:
In late 2019, the university's Coronavirus Research Center began tracking worldwide cases of the COVID-19 pandemic by compiling data from hundreds of sources around the world.[59] This led to the university becoming one of the most cited sources for data about the pandemic.[59]
The w: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) stopped tracking worldwide data tracking sometime around June 2022. This followed reduced world-wide rteporting reporting from daily to weekly on ?.
As of 20 June 2022, ECDC is discontinuing the data collection and publication of the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths worldwide. Please refer to the World Health Organization (WHO) data on COVID-19 and the WHO Weekly Epidemiological and Weekly Operational Updates page for the non-EU/EEA countries.
ECDC will continue providing weekly updates for EU/EEA Member States and report on an ad-hoc basis about significant events related to COVID-19 globally.
ECDC has been collecting data on the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths for all countries in the EU/EEA and globally for more than two years. The data collected by ECDC will continue to be available in an archived format.
So who maintains public COVID-19 worldwide data tracking now: W:WHO? CDC? X? Are their methods similar to the previous tracking services so that apples can be compared to apples and not to oranges?
US Supreme Court weighs in on property rights case in Minnesota edit
For updates check
Sources edit
- *Elizabeth B. Wydra, Brianne J. Gorod, Brian R. Frazelle, Miriam Becker-Cohen. "Tyler v. Hennepin County" — Constitutional Accountability Center, May 9, 2023
- Nina Totenberg. "Supreme Court seems to tilt strongly toward grandmother in property rights case" — NPR, April 26, 2023
- Andrew Chung, John Kruzel. "US Supreme Court mulls legality of a state's property tax 'windfall'" — Reuters, April 26, 2023
- "Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota" — SCOTUSblog, April 26, 2023 (date of access)
talk page copy&paste edit
Review of revision 4723568 [Not ready]
Revision 4723568 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: See below Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Unfortunately, this did not get published before the Supreme Court already heard the arguments. Fret not, however, as it should be fairly simple to update the focal point.
Questions about the above? Ask.
If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.
Review of revision 4724176 [Not ready]
Revision 4724176 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: For a title that talks about the Court 'weighing in', literally nothing apropos to the arguments themselves was mentioned. This is literally just a retelling of what happened and why in relation to the trial, not what happened DURING THE HEARINGS. Which, you know, both NPR and Reuters have addressed, and which would be obligatory for any synthesis. Comments by reviewer: None added.
Questions about the above? Ask.
If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.