I'm not sure why you removed two sources here. Were they unnecessary? In general, it's not good to, after publication, remove sources the author consulted to write the article, because the sources section is supposed to be a record of what they consulted. I would guess sources are automatically treated as having been consulted just by virtue of having been included, even if they're unnecessary. Heavy Water (talk) 00:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Of note. Heavy Water (talk) 00:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Those sources were completely unnecessary, yes. And yes, I didn't see that in the Guardian (probably since I was looking for captain). @Heavy Water Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 05:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply