Welcome to Wikinews

A nice cup of coffee for you while you get started

Getting started as a contributor
How to write an article
  1. Pick something current?
  2. Use two independent sources?
  3. Read your sources before writing the story in your own words?. Do choose a unique title? before you start.
  4. Follow Wikinews' structure? for articles, answering as many of who what when where why and how? as you can; summarised in a short, two- or three-sentence opening paragraph. Once complete, your article must be three or more paragraphs.
  5. If you need help, you can add {{helpme}} to your talkpage, along with a question, or alternatively, just ask?

  • Use this tab to enter your title and get a basic article template.
    [RECOMMENDED. Starts your article through the semi-automated {{develop}}—>{{review}}—>{{publish}} collaboration process.]

 Welcome! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally.
As you get more involved, you will need to look into key project policies and other discussions you can participate in; so, keep this message on this page and refer to the other links in it when you want to learn more, or have any problems.

Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation
Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation
  Used to contributing to Wikipedia? See here.
All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours.

Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere.

The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing.

Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly.

The core policies
Places to go, people to meet

Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion.

There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project.

Find help and get involved
Write your first article for Wikinews!

Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it!



It is recommended you read the article guide before starting. Also make sure to check the list of recently created articles to see if your story hasn't already been reported upon.


-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 11:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Re arrest story

edit

Hi Kitabc12345

An interesting read. Perhaps you can find out when the suspect will appear in court? This sometimes is an opportunity to refresh the story.

Welcome! Is there anything that I can do to help?

Regards, --Gryllida (talk) 20:25, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Re: editing other news

edit

Would you be interested in helping to edit new drafts added by others? Wikinews is looking for volunteers with this, to expedite the peer review process, and to help you gain news writing practice. This is easier than writing a complete story. :) And it may help you with your future writing.

Are you interested? If so, sign up here.

Regards, --Gryllida (talk) 20:32, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

US removes preferential treatment for Hong Kong

edit

Hi. I had some difficulties; review comments. (I do wish I'd been able to get to the review sooner.) --Pi zero (talk) 17:41, 17 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, I received it and I will make some changes.--Kitabc12345 (talk) 03:54, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
These videos are accompanied by text below. So don't worry too much lah. I'll keep repairs on the article. -04:27, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
@Pi zero: Hi, I've made some repairs to the article.--Kitabc12345 (talk) 04:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
I see that you made some changes. Some key concerns remain, though. The "polarity" of things is often unclear, that is, it's unclear whether they're positive or negative (and toward whom); and the nature of various technical measures is unclear, which also relates to positivity/negativity. The headline, for example, has been improved from
"US removes preferential treatment for Hong Kong"
to
"Trump removes Hong Kong's special status"
but, removing special status... is that something that improves the treatment, or degrades it? More restrictive or less, more favorable or less? I.e., positive or negative? (We'll want to make that "US President Trump", but that's not the main point here.) Similar difficulties apply in the lede and other passages, such as the second paragraph (which has been adjusted to state the circumstances of the remark). I also mentioned, the lede seems a big over-long and over-detailed.

I realize the sorts of things I'm asking for are fairly deep, intensively engaging the meanings of the passages. Truthfully, if the changes needed had been shallow, I might have been able to do them myself in my role as an independent reviewer, rather than requesting revision to the article. But, I do feel we would need to improve these aspects of the article, to produce an article that informs the reader. --Pi zero (talk) 05:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Pi zero: Eliminating special status is a reduction in treatment and is negative. I've included a link to Wikipedia in the press release, which should help readers to understand it.
I've tried so hard to improve this press release that I can't think of where I should start to improve it. --Kitabc12345 (talk) 09:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi

edit

Hello, Kitabc12345. It appears we could not save Trump removes Hong Kong's special status. I am sorry about it. And I would like to help you with what you can do in future. Let me know when you are free. Or please join #wikinews-en live connect and I can help you.
•–• 01:29, 22 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

I really wish we'd managed to review this sooner; on review I found some difficulties with it that were outside my reviewer's purview to address, and we now have limited time to revise and re-review the article unless some new development can be used to freshen it up (I remark further on this in the review comments). Review comments; also, as always, detailed history of edits during review. --Pi zero (talk) 20:12, 6 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Re: First confirmed case of COVID-19 found in Antarctica

edit

Please see feedback below:

  • In the first paragraph answer to "when" (what date) is missing. (WN:5W)
  • Also, passive voice is present in the first paragraph. Please reword. Please indicate who made the announcement. This is indicated later in the story, but passive voice is discouraged anywhere in the story, and this is also answer to 'Who' (WN:5W).

Please let me know if you would like assistance with any of these modifications. They would need to be made quickly to submit the story for review while it is still fresh. With regards and season greetings, --Gryllida (talk) 01:04, 25 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

P.S. "Fresh' is defined as 'key event happened at most 2-3 days prior to date of publication, or up to a week old with fresh details such as updates available within the last 2-3 days prior to publication.' See WN:Fresh. Thanks Gryllida (talk) 01:07, 25 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Eminently understandable. Being all volunteers, we all know that effect. Best wishes for a good holiday season to you, Kitabc12345. --Pi zero (talk) 12:49, 25 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Expanded and added an update, but it will need a reviewer being available (and any authors being able to respond to the reviewer quickly) for publication. I will try to check for feedback as often as practically possible. Gryllida (talk) 22:10, 25 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Published. Chilean authorities report first COVID-19 outbreak in Antarctica
Hope they manage the numbers. Again thanks for volunteering with writing the story in the busy holiday times.
Regards, Gryllida (talk) 02:28, 27 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

You are terribly overdue for this!!

edit
 
This award is presented to new reporters who have started 10 or fewer news articles.


--Bddpaux (talk) 15:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply







This is a largely lesser award, but you deserve it as well!

edit
  The Order of the Humble Pencil


For completing 5 edits.

Great work! Keep it up!--Bddpaux (talk) 15:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply