Fmrauch
Welcome
edit
Welcome to Wikinews
|
Getting started as a contributor
|
Welcome! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally. |
All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours.
Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere. The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing. Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly. |
The core policies
|
Places to go, people to meet
Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion. There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project. |
Find help and get involved
|
Write your first article for Wikinews!
Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it!
|
Hi. I'm looking at India: Independent hearing on nuclear power starts on Wednesday and finished reviewing it. I have left comments. If you could review those comments, reflect on them and change the text to address these points, that would be great. :) The article really lacks clarity about why this topic matters, who is running it and what the important facts are. For me, the last paragraph should probably be found combined in the first paragraph to better highlight why this topic matters. The international aspects should also be explained. International how? Indian speakers at an Indian conference does not appear to make it an international conference. (And there is no indication Greenpeace part is actually involved as parties outside India.) --LauraHale (talk) 11:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hi. I assessed the article not-ready, review comments here. Keep in mind, the first article at Wikinews is generally the hardest, because one is learning basics of Wikinews writing. --Pi zero (talk) 23:41, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Please do not be discouraged :)
editPlease do not become discouraged. Writing Wikinews is a process. Once you get the first two or three articles published, it becomes much easier as you can anticipate what reviewers will look for. It is getting that first one over the line that is difficult. I lost my first article because of timeliness issues and, while I thought I had followed the style guidelines, I had not fully grasped them. Even regular contributors sometimes run into problems. I believe both myself and Bddpaux have run afoul of "not news" in the past few months. (Mine was an interview with a Wikipedian and Bddpaux's was an issue of some one retiring.) Please do stick with it, because getting news out is very important. :) You're getting much closer now and having a few editors writing publishable articles about India would be great. :) --LauraHale (talk) 03:08, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
India article.........
editDoes the hearing start today, or did it start on Sunday....somehow, that bit got deleted?? --Bddpaux (talk) 20:57, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- TODAY ! --Fmrauch (talk) 08:08, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Please think before editing
editThe template W is meant to go to local categories. Where else would you find other news articles on India? --Brian McNeil / talk 11:49, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Where did you get 55,000
editWhere did you get the number 55,000 from in this article??? -- Cirt (talk) 23:01, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
"From one police station alone, charges have been brought against more than 55,000 people including 8,000 for sedition and ‘war against the state’." see http://www.dianuke.org/support-for-koodankulam-from-london-statement-by-cnd-south-asia-solidarity-group --Fmrauch (talk) 16:31, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- Question Are you involved in DiaNuke? --Brian McNeil / talk 17:00, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- No - I am only reporting ! --Fmrauch (talk) 16:40, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
- Just a clarification from my perspective. When checking the sources before proposing to remove the sentence (if we waited before acting, the article would have been frozen by the archive policy with the sentence in it, and we'd have been facing a likely {{correction}}), I noted the sentence quoted above. That sentence does not support the sentence in the Wikinews article; it does not indicate 55,000 people protesting at once, let alone the number of such "growing" to that size. --Pi zero (talk)
Thanks for starting the story. It was not ready; someone edited it and re-submitted it. I added several minor lede style questions on its talk page; as you're familiar with the sources already, addressing them may be trivial and can help toward the success of the next review. Thanks again. --Gryllida 12:53, 4 December 2012 (UTC) - It's done. --Fmrauch (talk) 23:01, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- Hi. I left some notes in reply to your remark on the talk page. The third one is kind of key: I suspected, and still suspect, that the article wasn't fresh even at the time it was last submitted for review, because the attempt to freshen it involved adding a newer source, but it didn't appear to use any newly-revealed information from that source. --Pi zero (talk) 14:04, 9 December 2012 (UTC)