Welcome to Wikinews

A nice cup of coffee for you while you get started

Getting started as a contributor
How to write an article
  1. Pick something current?
  2. Use two independent sources?
  3. Read your sources before writing the story in your own words?. Do choose a unique title? before you start.
  4. Follow Wikinews' structure? for articles, answering as many of who what when where why and how? as you can; summarised in a short, two- or three-sentence opening paragraph. Once complete, your article must be three or more paragraphs.
  5. If you need help, you can add {{helpme}} to your talkpage, along with a question, or alternatively, just ask?

  • Use this tab to enter your title and get a basic article template.
    [RECOMMENDED. Starts your article through the semi-automated {{develop}}—>{{review}}—>{{publish}} collaboration process.]

 Welcome, 1Kwords! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally.
As you get more involved, you will need to look into key project policies and other discussions you can participate in; so, keep this message on this page and refer to the other links in it when you want to learn more, or have any problems.

Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation
Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation
  Used to contributing to Wikipedia? See here.
All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours.

Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere.

The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing.

Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly.

The core policies
Places to go, people to meet

Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion.

There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project.

Find help and get involved
Write your first article for Wikinews!

Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it!



It is recommended you read the article guide before starting. Also make sure to check the list of recently created articles to see if your story hasn't already been reported upon.


-- 11:20, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Riots break out in France after 2018 World Cup victory

edit

Hi. This seems a credible first submission; there's always an initial learning curve, of course, in getting down the basics. Please see my review comments, and detailed history of edits during review. (I didn't attempt an in-depth source-check —the most labor- and time-intensive part of a review— this time around since there were other problems that would prevent publication.) --Pi zero (talk) 04:57, 17 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello 1Kwords. Just to clarify to the above: please consider implementing each of the changes suggested by the reviewer within several hours at most and re-submitting for review -- this would allow the story to be re-reviewed while it is still fresh. (Alas, occasionally people write articles and do not re-submit, or do so when it is already too late. That's something I am trying to avoid, here, by encouraging timely re-submission.) --Gryllida (talk) 06:12, 17 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Gryllida (t · c · b) thanks for your encouragement, but unfortunately the article I submitted represents the maximum commitment of time+effort I can dedicate towards wikinews. Also I agree with Pi zero (t · c · b) that in-depth source checking is the most time-consuming, this goes in particular for the effort to write the article. 1Kwords (talk) 07:50, 21 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
As far as I can tell, my submission lived up to the 5 items posted at the top of my talk page, but it was still not publbished. Best of luck with the en.Wikinews project. The threshhold for the publication is clearly a lot higher than those 5 items suggest. 1Kwords (talk) 07:55, 21 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Actually, the article was below the minimal length -- that is three medium-sized paragraphs, not counting the one-line paragraphs.
•–• 08:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
The article was factually correct and based on credible sources. If that goes unpublished, that may well be according to wikinews policy. The strangest criticism is that a reviewer who reviews an article about an event in France does not comfortably read French. 1Kwords (talk) 14:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Articles below the minimal length fails in the style criteria. And you can not blame English Wikinews reviewer for not knowing French. It is English Wikinews, not French Wikinews.
•–• 19:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Corner case: are editors are banned from writing about topics for which there are no English sources? 1Kwords (talk) 07:15, 22 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
I'd fix it, but I'm deeply unfamiliar with the topic. :-/
If this is the most you can do this time, perhaps good luck allocating a larger time slot for revisions on the next go. Gryllida (talk) 21:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Style is equally important. You are not banned from writing about any news, but it would be better to use English sources (as mentioned in the Source policy), or if not, provide a translation (like how I provided for this article Indian Supreme Court orders transfer of Asifa Bano gang rape and murder case to Pathankot See the talk page, which helps with the translation). IN any case, we do not solely rely on machine translation -- it has failed many times.
•–• 07:38, 22 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
[deleted irrelevant items]
This is a news item I thought I would find on en.Wikinews, but it seems that en.Wikipedia.org was first. 1Kwords (talk) 20:36, 9 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia doesn't produce news articles. It can't, structurally. --Pi zero (talk) 21:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
In this case, neither can Wikinews. Someone at Wikipedia has produced an article which is new, that's not the same thing as a news article. Best of luck with the enWN project. 1Kwords (talk) 22:04, 9 November 2018 (UTC)Reply