Wikinews:Flagged revisions/Requests for permissions/Removal/Gopher65
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Gopher65 (talk · contribs – Edit rights)
The user okay'ed with being de-sysopped. I notified the reviewer twice last year about having not reviewed articles for more than two years. Someone requested a review on a now-deleted article, but Gopher65 didn't reply or do anything else regarding that. I know enforcing WN:PEP is challenging or irritating to others, especially when the project has a very small community. However, another user's reviewer tools were taken away recently, implying that PEP should apply, even when reluctant to do so. --George Ho (talk) 21:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Stats
- Links for Gopher65: Gopher65 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · logs · block log · review log · lu)
Questions and comments
It's been 7 days, pretty clear consensus here. Tagging our active admin @Cromium: (minus Bddpaux, who has said they will stay away from RFP for 1 year). Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Votes
Support - Inactive and said they are fine with it more than a year ago. Hope they will become active again and reapply.Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)- Support uncontroversial. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Hope they come back at some point! A.S. Thawley (talk) (calendar) 18:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support - straightforward case. Leaderboard (talk) 12:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Leaderboard. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:51, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Permission removed and note left at user talk page. [24Cr][talk] 00:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.