Kenfyre
Welcome to Wikinews
|
Getting started as a contributor
|
Welcome, Kenfyre! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally. |
All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours.
Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere. The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing. Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly. |
The core policies
|
Places to go, people to meet
Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion. There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project. |
Find help and get involved
|
Write your first article for Wikinews!
Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it!
|
Hi. I've reviewed this article; it's actually a pretty good first submission to Wikinews, but I did encounter some things that need to be addressed; see my review comments. Hopefully we can get it into shape to publish while the story is still fresh. --Pi zero (talk) 19:36, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Published. Congrats on your first Wikinews publication! See the detailed history of edits during review; I try to deliberately break up my edits during review into small pieces so it's possible to look through edit-by-edit and see what I'm doing. --Pi zero (talk) 18:01, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Please see my review. You write well! Please hang in there.....you seem to be learning our style here very quickly. Please dont run away mad! Again: Hang in there!!! Back up, take a deep breath and submit again! --Bddpaux (talk) 18:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
This is long overdue
editThe Order of the Modest Pencil
| ||
Great work! Keep it up!--Bddpaux (talk) 02:00, 2 July 2014 (UTC) |
1 article published! (Heck, we all started right where you are!!)
editPublished. Pretty solidly written article. Detailed history of edit during review. --Pi zero (talk) 00:52, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Published. Interesting. Review comments, history of edits during review. --Pi zero (talk) 15:53, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. This article needs a new focus, if it's to work at this point. Review comments. --Pi zero (talk) 16:23, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- I can't find any new angle. Can I move it to one of my userspace pages and drop it?. --Kenfyre (talk) 17:25, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- We can do that for you. (We don't leave redirects from mainspace to userspaced unpublished articles like this, so an admin has to be involved, to make there's no redirect left behind.)
- With synthesis articles we usually don't save them (except sometimes with students, where it matters to have the article around as evidence for their class grade); but, sure, you're a regular contributor and since you ask, I'll take care of it for you later this afternoon (and if I forget, you can remind me). --Pi zero (talk) 18:35, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, Done. Now at User:Kenfyre/India Finance Minister presents 2014-15 budget. :-) --Pi zero (talk) 14:13, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. Much appreciated. Kenfyre (talk) 17:38, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Was this an accident, not submitting it for review when it was written? Although I don't think that happens too often, I know it has sometimes happened, and we should do all we can to keep it from happening. Do you think it would help to put some sort of prominent reminder/warning into the text of template {{develop}}? Any ideas what might be helpful there? Currently it looks like this:
This article is being developed. You can contribute or discuss its development. |
This article is being developed. You can contribute or discuss its development. If it is ready to be checked, you can Submit for review. This is not a way to ask others to expand or finish the article! You should review discussion about this article, and verify original reporting notes are adequate. Click to add OR notes. |
--Pi zero (talk) 14:08, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- It was an accident, if fact, my internet went down as I had completed it and was looking for updates. Kenfyre (talk) 17:40, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Ouch. It's been a while, but I've had technical problems that cut me off from Wikinews for days at a time. (The US infrastructure is still quite stable, I guess, by global standards, but it's not as solid as it was when I was younger.) --Pi zero (talk) 18:02, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Tell me about. In India, unless you live in one of the metros, you will get very bad service. Even if I am willing to pay more, I can't higher than 1 Mbps in my city. Many people tether their phones (which is legal but expensive) when internet goes down for weeks in some towns. --Kenfyre (talk) 10:31, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
In retrospect, this would have been a stronger article if the lede had given a sense of the intended consequences of identifying a bank as systemically important. (That is: the systemically important ones have to keep more cash on hand, rather than, say, being assured the government will bail them out if they get in trouble.) It's mentioned later in the article, but seems to be a point that can be misunderstood, so would have been good to mention earlier. --Pi zero (talk) 14:28, 28 July 2014 (UTC)