Talk:New South Wales Premier criticised over government structure

Needs additional sources

Multiple sources are a must for articles to maintain neutrality. Kayau (talk · contribs) 10:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Review of revision 1208986 [Failed]

Revision 1208986 of this article has been reviewed by Bluegoblin7 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:39, 6 April 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: More than one source would be great NPOV: Not ready: More than one source would be great Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Whilst the article is in good shape and meets all the criteria to be published, I would feel more comfortable if there were further sources (or source) from a different outlet, as the two given are both from the same one, raising NPOV and verifiability/reliability alarm bells in my head. Thanks. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1208986 of this article has been reviewed by Bluegoblin7 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:39, 6 April 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: More than one source would be great NPOV: Not ready: More than one source would be great Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Whilst the article is in good shape and meets all the criteria to be published, I would feel more comfortable if there were further sources (or source) from a different outlet, as the two given are both from the same one, raising NPOV and verifiability/reliability alarm bells in my head. Thanks. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1209937 [Passed]

Revision 1209937 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:07, 8 April 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1209937 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:07, 8 April 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Edit request

{{editprotected}} Please add Category:Conservatism

Thanks! Lionelt (talk) 10:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Not done as the category has been deleted. — μchip08 10:56, 5 July 2011 (UTC)