Uncle g - I noticed you're preserving the structural integrity of the working model of the proposal. I appreciate that. The category names I'm not picky about, I just want the template names to be short so they're quick and easy to change. I named the categories as I did to reflect the template names, but that's not neccessary. I would think "urgent review" should go before "final review", but I don't know the details of the purpose/motivation of it. Perhaps you could leave a comment on the proposed workspace talk page about the improvements you've made. I want people to modify it, provided that the concept remains intact (a new concept deserves a new proposal) Thanks. Kevin Baastalk 06:41, 2005 May 31 (UTC)
If you see a problem with an article, you can add an {{rfc}} tag at the top, but please also leave a comment on the article's discussion page explaining why you have added the tag, so that other editors know how to fix the article.
Many of the articles below need work on them in some way; feel free to start editing! To see what is and is not suitable for Wikinews articles, see the content guide and the site guidelines. You may find Wikinews:Article flags of use, in order to invite people to work on certain aspects of an article, or inform them about the state of the article, including a number of common problems which arise.
These stories are constructed ahead of time about an event that has not occurred but that is expected to take place in the future. They are not to be published until an official announcement has been made or reputable sources have been found for the events described. In the meantime, you are welcome to edit them to keep them up to date with what is expected to happen.