Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Removal/Sfullenwider (admin)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for de-adminship which resulted in admin rights being removed. Please do not modify it.

User:Sfullenwider edit

This user has used their admin tools only 3 times, and also are inactive, with one edit in Jan 2007, and before that in Oct 06. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Markie (talk • contribs) 17:57, 9 May 2008‎

Votes edit

Support per nom --MarkTalk to me 17:57, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom - Inactive for over a year. Cirt - (talk) 18:19, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support removal due to inactivity. Adambro - (talk) 22:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support inactive --Ryan524 - (talk) 23:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. --Skenmy^(t•c•w) 09:33, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brian McNeil / ^talk 12:46, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel (talk) 13:54, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support removal of rights. This user is clearly inactive on Wikinews. Theres no point in allowing him to keep the admin tools if he hasn't edited for months. If they return and request the admin tools back, however, I would probably support them. User:Anonymous101 :) 17:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I oppose removal of adminship due to inactivity as a matter of personal opinion. I also oppose the proposed policy WN:IP. The only difference between these requests and an automatic removal seems to be that here, they don't get notified by email. --SVTCobra 19:58, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I disagree with WN:IP. -- IlyaHaykinson (talk) 07:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per SVT and Ilya. --+Deprifry+ 11:46, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of the Admin's page or the talk page of the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.