Wikinews:Flagged revisions/Requests for permissions/JJLiu112 (2)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Closed as successful. [₂₄Cr][talk] 19:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

JJLiu112 (talk · contribs – Edit rights) edit

See the previous request at WN:Flagged revisions/Requests for permissions/JJLiu112

I am pleased to nominate JJLiu112 to become a reviewer. Today we carried out a co-review of Taliban further restrict women's rights. They asked all the right questions and explained what they would do as a reviewer. They also carried out a thorough copyedit to the article. I feel they have shown the correct level of maturity, patience (about three hours spent on the review!) and knowledge required for a reviewer. I recommend the community support this request for permissions. @JJLiu112:, please confirm your acceptance of this nomination by signing just below. -- [₂₄Cr][talk] 18:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I gladly accept. --JJLiu112 (talk) 19:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stats edit

Links for JJLiu112: JJLiu112 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · logs · block log · review log · lu)

Questions and comments edit

I have just gave you my support, nevertheless I would appreciate some feedback on these questions:

Could you please elaborate on the method by which you examined Taliban further restrict women's rights? What happened during the review, and in what order?
Assume an article about an unfamiliar place or process had been submitted. Please pick an unfamiliar subject and elaborate on how and where you would check the background of such a news event.
Would you, as a reviewer, suggest sources to the author of a failed article? Why?
How do you think reviewing would fit into your timetable?

Thank you for accepting the nomination. - Xbspiro (talk) 06:21, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

Support As nominator. [₂₄Cr][talk] 18:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support All I can do is wish you the best of luck, and that I look forward to seeing more excellent contributions from your side. Henrymyman (talk) 20:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Let that egg hatch. - Xbspiro (talk) 06:21, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support We need some more reviewers in this project and you seem to be the perfect candidate. 2006nishan178713^t@lk 15:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.