Welcome edit

Zir, welcome to Wikinews! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Our key policies - if you read anything, read these!

Here a few pointers to help you get to know Wikinews:

There are always things to do on Wikinews:

By the way, you can sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, you can ask them at the water cooler or to anyone on the Welcommittee, or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

Queues form outside struggling UK bank; calm urged edit

I noticed you added new content to the article, Queues form outside struggling UK bank; calm urged, which is more than 24 hours old. Thanks for taking an active role in improving the content on this site. People like you who take an active role make Wikinews better for all of us — readers and writers alike.

One thing to note, though, is that Wikinews articles are not works in progress. Articles are considered historical documents reflecting the knowledge and understanding of the event at the time of publishing. Once published for more than a day or so, they should not be continually updated or modified, except to fix minor style issues (eg. spelling mistakes).

To report on new developments in an ongoing story, you can create a new article instead of just adding content to an already published, out of date article. That way your work will be seen by more people since readers tend not to revisit old news articles looking for updates.

If a published article contains a factual error, please bring it to our attention at WN:ALERT, so that a {{Correction}} notice can be added to the article, which is otherwise left unchanged.

Again, thanks for helping improve this site. FellowWiki Newsie 19:10, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

FYI on speedy deleting redirects edit

I have removed the speedy deletion categories from the redirects. They can't be deleted, in case any external sites link directly to that title. Anybody following the links would get a page not found, rather than being directed to the article under its current title. —Zachary talk 10:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

BBC Resources sale could be un-profitable edit

Hi Zir, thanks for the excellent article. I added some additional sources, there could be some stuff in there that you might want to add to the article. Cheers and happy editing. --SVTCobra 23:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi again, you should probably consider this article to be "wrapped" as Wikinews articles are not to be ongoing works-in-progress, unlike over Wikipedia. Thanks. --SVTCobra 19:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Editing protected pages edit

Sorry to be an anorak, but spotted some duff wikilinks (due to lack of capitals) in those past BBC articles that I quoted:

BBC television centreBBC Television Centre and BectuBECTU in "BBC drops programmes as third of staff join strike"

BectuBECTU is wrong in "BBC prepared for news blackout as staff strike"
and also in "Unions ballot to "shut down the BBC""
The latter also has a Independent Television which could be improved from disambig. to Independent Television

Presumably there's somewhere to report such things rather than pestering you (but I've not found it yet).

Regards...Zir 12:36, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Done You are right, there is a way to request changes to archieved articles. Simply, add {{editprotected}} to the collaboration page and then describe the changes that should be made. The request will automatically show up on a list for Admins to take action. Cheers, --SVTCobra 12:48, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Late edits edit

Under no circumstances should a source that is dated after an article be added to a published article. Wikinews rules are that no content changes should be made 24-36 hours after an article is published.

Wikinews is not Wikipedia, and what goes in an article is what is known at that point in time. Yes, even to the extent that it may be wrong. I reverted your changes to the BBC sell-off article, and even were it current I should have too because you added a source that was not used in the creation of the article. --Brian McNeil / talk 10:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply