Uow-mg012
Welcome to Wikinews
|
Getting started as a contributor
|
Welcome! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally. |
All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours.
Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere. The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing. Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly. |
The core policies
|
Places to go, people to meet
Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion. There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project. |
Find help and get involved
|
Write your first article for Wikinews!
Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it!
|
UOW?
editAre you a University of Wollongong student? If so, please put a {{UoW student}} template on your user page, like this:
{{UoW student |year=2013 |semester=Autumn |course= }}
Your article
editI renamed your article to Boston bombing suspect charged. Articles use the sentence case style of capitalization for headlines according to the Wikinews style guide. Thanks for your contribution! —Mikemoral♪♫ 20:14, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi. I've been reviewing your article. It looks as if you had a lot of trouble with formatting, and didn't submit it for review. Another user submitted it for review a few hours ago.
- I cleaned up most of the formatting problems; I know formatting like that can be really hard to figure out without an example of how it's done, so I'm hoping by cleaning it up on this article I've given you a helpful example. By all means, if you have more questions, ask.
- Unfortunately, the elapsed time while it wasn't asking for review has taken it all the way to stale. :-S
- My review comments are here. --Pi zero (talk) 22:57, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Cleveland article
editExcellent effort!! Please read my comments and re-submit accordingly. --Bddpaux (talk) 16:25, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
- Your article has been deleted as abandoned, but I have moved it to your userspace so you can keep it for future reference. The page name is User:Uow-mg012/Man charged with Cleveland, Ohio kidnapping. —Mikemoral♪♫ 08:10, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Wikilinking
editWhen making wikilinks on Wikinews, take note that we use the {{w}} template. You use it like this:
{{w|PAGENAME}}
If Wikinews has a category or portal with that name, then it will link internally to Wikinews, otherwise, it links to Wikipedia. I changed all the links on your article. Thanks for your latest article. —Mikemoral♪♫ 05:05, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I carried a review partway through, hit a distance-from-source problem, and requested the reporter go through and eliminate such. See review comments, and detailed history of edits during review. --Pi zero (talk) 19:33, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Another review. I've written another set of review comments; and there were also additional edits during review.
- Effective synthesis can be a tricky thing; some people take to it naturally, others not so much. We've had some serious discussions here, over time, about how best to explain how it's done; it's possible that additional software tools we've hoping to get on-line in the future will help us. The most impressive experience I've had on this front was actually the first time I reviewed a synthesis article by Blood Red Sandman (a skilled Wikinewsie who hasn't been around lately); the article organization didn't remotely resemble any of the sources, each sentence contained material from scattered parts of one or more sources, and if any given source passage was used, its content appeared scattered across the Wikinews article. I've been trying ever since to figure out how to share with newcomers the aha! experience of tracing the way the sources mapped onto that synthesis article. --Pi zero (talk) 15:05, 17 May 2013 (UTC)