Welcome to Wikinews

A nice cup of coffee for you while you get started

Getting started as a contributor
How to write an article
  1. Pick something current?
  2. Use two independent sources?
  3. Read your sources before writing the story in your own words?. Do choose a unique title? before you start.
  4. Follow Wikinews' structure? for articles, answering as many of who what when where why and how? as you can; summarised in a short, two- or three-sentence opening paragraph. Once complete, your article must be three or more paragraphs.
  5. If you need help, you can add {{helpme}} to your talkpage, along with a question, or alternatively, just ask?

  • Use this tab to enter your title and get a basic article template.
    [RECOMMENDED. Starts your article through the semi-automated {{develop}}—>{{review}}—>{{publish}} collaboration process.]

 Welcome! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally.
As you get more involved, you will need to look into key project policies and other discussions you can participate in; so, keep this message on this page and refer to the other links in it when you want to learn more, or have any problems.

Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation
Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation
  Used to contributing to Wikipedia? See here.
All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours.

Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere.

The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing.

Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly.

The core policies
Places to go, people to meet

Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion.

There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project.

Find help and get involved
Write your first article for Wikinews!

Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it!



It is recommended you read the article guide before starting. Also make sure to check the list of recently created articles to see if your story hasn't already been reported upon.


-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 18:19, 9 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Trouble with sources

edit

Hi. I looked at your other article (SVTCobra had successfully reviewed one) and found two of the sources paywalled. I remarked further on the article's talk page. --Pi zero (talk) 20:31, 10 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

"Use your own words"

edit

When one can't figure out how else to say something, there's nothing quite so frustrating, I've noticed over the years, as being told "use your own words", as if that were somehow enough to tell me how to say it differently. I've noticed, though, that once you get in the habit of expressing information in a completely different way than the sources, it can become natural as breathing, and then when you see someone else closely imitating the way something was said in a source you find yourself thinking, "use your own words" :-)

For me, a particularly memorable experience was the first time I reviewed a synthesis article by Blood Red Sandman (BRS). Because I was reviewing it, I got to see it from the inside out, studying how each bit of the article related to the bits of the sources that verified it. Typically, a synthesis sentence would contain information from multiple widely scattered parts of the sources, often in different sources; and a given source sentence might provide bits of information to multiple, widely scattered parts of the synthesis. It was quite a revelation in terms of what is possible, going far, far beyond merely rewording a particular sentence. Ever since, I've been looking for some way to share with new arrivals that inside-out view of a really well-synthesized article. Unfortunately, it's not as easy as a reviewer demonstrating for a writer what's needed by fixing copyvio problems in an article they've written: the reviewer is limited in how much they can do, because the reviewer is supposed to remain sufficiently uninvolved with writing the article that they still qualify as an independent reviewer. The result is that about all the reviewer can do is rearrange a few particular sentences, which is not what the writer should be trying to do. And we tend to be left saying "use your own words". --Pi zero (talk) 12:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Rick Perry article

edit

I'm going to post the glut of what your wrote to an ancillary User talk page for you.....you submitted a lot of words!! Possibly, you can even spin that stuff into a totally different article down the road. --Bddpaux (talk) 18:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

and most of that will be found here: User talk:Ndshankar/Perry deleted text