Talk:World leaders call to address Amazon rainforest fires at G7
My goal on this one was to get it prepped quickly. Improvements and collaboration are very welcome. Darkfrog24 (talk) 14:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- I do see English language sources were late in reporting this, but the focal event is on its last legs. The initial sentence is baffling to say the least. I quote "artificial lighting in a combination of cold front, clouds and smoke" ... Obviously, something is out of order here. --SVTCobra 19:40, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Images
editFile:Fires_in_Brazil_(48594167912).jpg
--Gryllida (talk) 21:48, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, Gryllida, but I think we need a new focal point. --SVTCobra 21:52, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Really? Did something new happen? Gryllida (talk) 22:35, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- No (well, not that I know), but it happened Monday (no?) and it is Thursday now, Friday GMT --SVTCobra 22:38, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Freshness be a harsh mistress. Darkfrog24 (talk) 23:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- No (well, not that I know), but it happened Monday (no?) and it is Thursday now, Friday GMT --SVTCobra 22:38, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Darkfrog24, SVTCobra, Gryllida: I think I may have just heard the PBS Newshour say (about an hour ago) there has been a new development in this story, something about reversing a previously stated position that they don't need international assistance to deal with the situation. Maybe. --Pi zero (talk) 23:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, I hope Darkfrog24 can act on this. I am awake only about two hours every day, and doubt in my ability to contribute. I'm really grateful for your sharing of this. Gryllida (talk) 23:59, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Darkfrog24, SVTCobra, Gryllida: I think I may have just heard the PBS Newshour say (about an hour ago) there has been a new development in this story, something about reversing a previously stated position that they don't need international assistance to deal with the situation. Maybe. --Pi zero (talk) 23:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
(edit conflict):::::True. I wonder why the news was so delayed. Sao Paulo is not exactly outside of normal communication distance. Did the "news" just sit on it while they reported on Hong Kong? --SVTCobra 23:32, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- I have heard there's been a push by the Brazilian government to minimize reports of the fires, largely because the indigenous won a lawsuit earlier this year that gave them rights to the land, and the Brazilian president went out in public, Trump-style and encouraged the farmers and agrobusinesses to violate the ruling. Darkfrog24 (talk) 15:15, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Review of revision 4503124 [Not ready]
edit
Revision 4503124 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:58, 22 August 2019 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Past the freshness window as commented on this talk page, above. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 4503124 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:58, 22 August 2019 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Past the freshness window as commented on this talk page, above. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 4503948 [Passed]
edit
Revision 4503948 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4503948 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |