Talk:Danish unofficial draft version of UNCCC treaty leaks, G77 reacts sharply

propose

• I had been working on COP15, "Danish text" divides climate summit, could these be merged.
• From what I have read, the document is not a "draft version of UNCCC treaty" but a alternative treaty outside of the Kyoto framework. I think the page title should be something like COP15, Unoffical "Danish text" leaks, G77 reacts sharply. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mrchris (talk • contribs)

If you think you can pull off the merge, go for it! "Technically" you should merge to oldest, but that's sometimes just a micro-stub. It would be great to see an article a day on the conference, so if there's a few-sentence para needs cut, save a copy for later - just in case. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 15:25, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

I accept the merging proposal and title change. Will try to realise in three hours. Gryllida (page, contributions, talk) 10:31, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

merged Gryllida (page, contributions, talk) 10:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

title not changed, as I think the current title is more informative, and the word "unofficial" is enough to emphasize the status of the document. Gryllida (page, contributions, talk) 11:06, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

I still think that it is not a "draft version of UNCCC treaty" but a alternative treaty outside/instead of the Kyoto framework. here is how I think it should be described - The ‘Danish text’ calls for a new and alternate framework instead of the Kyoto Protocol. It has caused anger among developing countries who fear that could replace negotiations under Bali Road Map. - this is why - Brazil, South Africa, India and China, the BASIC bloc, have called for all climate change negotiations to be held under the UNFCCC framework. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrchris (talk • contribs) 16:06, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Review of revision 920909 [Passed]

Revision 920909 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:27, 10 December 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 920909 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:27, 10 December 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Edit

A contributor has requested that an edit be made to this protected page. Once this request is completed by an administrator, please remove this template. You may wish to ask for the help of a volunteer to make your requested edit.

A contributor has requested that an edit be made to this protected page. Once this request is completed by an administrator, please remove this template. You may wish to ask for the help of a volunteer to make your requested edit.

Please add links for Copenhagen, the EU, the US, and Denmark in the lead. And please add this to Category:Europe and transfer it out of Category:Climate (otherwise unused; I imagine it would in practice virtually duplicate the scope of Category:Weather, if not Category:Climate change, too) and into Category:Climate change, Category:Weather, and Category:Environment. Heavy Water (talk) 21:41, 21 July 2023 (UTC)