Talk:Abducted Canadian-US couple recovered from Pakistan's tribal areas

The first ref I have found for this story is https://www.romper.com/p/this-mom-gave-birth-3-times-as-a-hostage-in-pakistan-now-the-family-is-free-2905596, which according to Googlenews: Romper-15 hours ago. Just curious to find where this all started? Ottawahitech (talk) 13:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC) Please ping me

The couple was abducted by Haqqani Network in 2012 when they were on a tour to Afghanistan. The woman was pregnant for 7 months at the time of abduction. During her abduction, she gave birth to three children, one girl and two boys. In Dec 2016, a video was released by the militants in which the couple pledged the forces to set them free. A day ago, Pakistani military led an operation against the kidnappers on joint intelligence reports from USA.--Asadwarraich (talk) 18:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Review of revision 4355900 [Passed]

Revision 4355900 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The date of the focal event has to be specified in the lede, both because "when" is one of the five Ws and because it's needed to establish freshness. There was apparently an update on Friday (regarding repatriation), which helps a bit with freshness in this case. There were a few phrases slightly over-length to be identical to source; see WN:PILLARS#own. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4355900 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The date of the focal event has to be specified in the lede, both because "when" is one of the five Ws and because it's needed to establish freshness. There was apparently an update on Friday (regarding repatriation), which helps a bit with freshness in this case. There were a few phrases slightly over-length to be identical to source; see WN:PILLARS#own. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.