Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Bureaucrat/Green Giant

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Closed as successful, privs granted by Gryllida.
•–• 05:47, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Green Giant (talk · contribs) — bureaucratship

Green Giant (t · c · b) is one another one of the veteran Wikinewsies and Wikimedian in general. GG is a steward, an admin, reviewer, and holds many priv'd positions on several wikis. They are excellent candidate for 'crat whom I trust can serve well and would like to nominate them for b'crat, provided they accept the nomination.
•–• 15:47, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination accepted. Forgot to say so earlier! --Green Giant (talk) 20:33, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the nomination, Acagastya. Actioned this request as successful now. This section can be archived. Regards, --Gryllida (talk) 05:37, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stats

Links for Green Giant: Green Giant (talk · contribs · deleted · count · logs · block log · review log · lu)

Questions and comments

QuestionGreen Giant What in your opinion makes a contributor a good candidate for bureaucratship? Interested to know your insight, though I have already placed my vote :). Thanks. --Gryllida (talk) 23:08, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gryllida: Thank you for the question. There are multiple qualities needed to be a good bureaucrat (although I’d say the same are needed for any advanced permission) but two that I think are particularly useful are good judgement and patience. Good judgement is needed for interpreting the thoughts of the community and guiding such discussions where necessary. Patience is needed for the times where opposing opinions might clash but a mature and "professional" approach would try to reduce tensions. --Green Giant (talk) 23:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Strong support as the nominator!
•–• 15:47, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. How could you say no? --JJLiu112 (talk) 16:44, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the nominator —chaetodipus (talk · contribs) 03:35, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of course!--Bddpaux (talk) 15:05, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Gopher65_talk 03:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination --LivelyRatification (talk) 05:29, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Excellent and dedicated candidate. Thank you for volunteering. --Gryllida (talk) 23:37, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.