Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Bureaucrat/Bddpaux

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Closed as successful, privs granted by Gryllida.
•–• 05:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bddpaux (talk · contribs) — bureaucratship

Bddpaux (t · c · b) has been a long-time 'newsie who has served in the capacity of admin and reviewer for ages (and is also an AR with scoop access). One of the most friendly and trusted candidates for 'crat whom I trust can serve well and would like to nominate them for b'crat, provided they accept the nomination.
•–• 15:47, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the nomination, Acagastya. Actioned this request as successful now. This section can be archived. Regards, --Gryllida (talk) 05:36, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stats

Links for Bddpaux: Bddpaux (talk · contribs · deleted · count · logs · block log · review log · lu)

Questions and comments

I accept the nomination. Thanks!--Bddpaux (talk) 15:51, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What in your opinion makes a contributor a good candidate for bureaucratship? Interested to know your insight, though I have already placed my vote :). Thanks. Gryllida (talk) 23:08, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CC @Bddpaux:
•–• 03:08, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, 99% of my answer to this question is based on how I saw PiZero behave. I hope (like he was), I can be a stoic, dependable person who keeps his mind on the larger value of this thing we are doing here: Citizen Journalism of the highest caliber. Keeping a sense of order and maturity here is a constant and never ending job AND I hope I can help develop and mentor some new blood around here too.--Bddpaux (talk) 13:26, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is actually starting to get comedic. I mean..... we (quite obviously) need more than 1 ‘Crat around here. What needs to happen to make this come to pass? I promise: I wont beg. I think it’s degrading (given my decade’s worth of devotion to this project) to have to quack like this.—Bddpaux (talk) 20:25, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Strong support as the nominator!
•–• 15:47, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional Support, if there is a commitment to lasting activity. --JJLiu112 (talk) 16:43, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nominator. --Green Giant (talk) 22:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the nominator as well —chaetodipus (talk · contribs) 03:35, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 12:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — There needs to be at least one more bureaucrat. — Gopher65_talk 03:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. --LivelyRatification (talk) 05:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per the above. I appreciate your thorough attention to the content of the articles, as well as technical sides of how the site works. --Gryllida (talk) 23:37, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.