Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Dendodge

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

Dendodge (talk · contribs)

I'd like to nominate Dendodge for adminship here. He's been around for over half a year now, and has been consistently active for the past two or so months. He's written and reviewed a lot of articles in his time here, and I think he could help the project even more with the admin tools. Tempodivalse [talk] 20:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Questions and comments

Question Do you accept this nomination? Tempodivalse [talk] 20:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I am honoured by the nomination, and ~~humbly~~ accept in the hope that it will be the first step towards achieving my evil plans for world domination! Dendodge _T\^C 20:37, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Take the job seriously, but never take yourself seriously. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 01:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Support as nominator. Tempodivalse [talk] 20:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I nom'd him for sysop at the English Wikipedia, so I'm still pretty confident in Dendodge's abilities as an admin. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:13, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per Tempodivalse (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 21:15, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 21:37, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support although, I'm worried about this 'humbly' bit. You're supposed to become a Wikinews admin with plans for world domination — then get handed a bucket and mop. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 21:50, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree I am a new user and do not know much about Wikinews policies and guidelines, why to support for an RfA under what conditions, etc. but Dendodge has helped me a lot in my early stages and he has guided me with the policies and I was totally new to Flagged Revs as wikipedia doesn't have it. He helped me out with that too. I think he is quite experienced and knows about wikinews and the community very well. So, I think I have to support and he has received good community consensus above. Srin ivas 06:20, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yep Tris 12:51, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Brianmc though, this humbleness is a bit disturbing, but it could just be a ploy to get us to let our guard down ;). Bawolff ☺☻ 01:37, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Better now? Dendodge _T\^C 19:10, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ha! The evil conspirator has his vile scheme uncovered! Weclome to the ~~cabal~~ janitor's room. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 20:54, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - Much better. Strong Support. Bawolff ☺☻ 01:13, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't know whether I can !vote; however, I support Dendodge to use the tools well. Pmlineditor^Talk 09:39, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support I thought he already was... --Skenmy ^talk 10:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support No reason to believe that Dendodge will misuse the tools --Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 10:33, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.