Welcome to Wikinews

A nice cup of coffee for you while you get started

Getting started as a contributor
How to write an article
  1. Pick something current?
  2. Use two independent sources?
  3. Read your sources before writing the story in your own words?. Do choose a unique title? before you start.
  4. Follow Wikinews' structure? for articles, answering as many of who what when where why and how? as you can; summarised in a short, two- or three-sentence opening paragraph. Once complete, your article must be three or more paragraphs.
  5. If you need help, you can add {{helpme}} to your talkpage, along with a question, or alternatively, just ask?

  • Use this tab to enter your title and get a basic article template.
    [RECOMMENDED. Starts your article through the semi-automated {{develop}}—>{{review}}—>{{publish}} collaboration process.]

 Welcome, QUIX4U2! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally.
As you get more involved, you will need to look into key project policies and other discussions you can participate in; so, keep this message on this page and refer to the other links in it when you want to learn more, or have any problems.

Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation
Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation
  Used to contributing to Wikipedia? See here.
All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours.

Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere.

The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing.

Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly.

The core policies
Places to go, people to meet

Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion.

There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project.

Find help and get involved
Write your first article for Wikinews!

Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it!



It is recommended you read the article guide before starting. Also make sure to check the list of recently created articles to see if your story hasn't already been reported upon.


-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:05, 19 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

THIS ACCOUNT - IS NOT A DELIBERATE DUPLICATE

edit

(it was done ONLY to allow oneoff login to "only" the Wikinews)

edit

Hi-

This account's "creation" WAS NOT A DELIBERATE DUPLICATE ACCOUNT.

I am (and always have been) currently "logged_in" on Wikipedia & all of it's "other" sister projects as:

User:QUIX4U.

(except apparently - this orphaned "Wikinews" project).

However when I came here, to this wikinews project today -- to contact an Administrator to help adjudicate on another matter that I desperately need help with.

Wikinews didn't auto log me in here as I thought t would.

Neither could I action the account .. by selecting my Wikipedia (normal) username

Which is of course .. "User:QUIX4U"

Wikinews had no record of my username here ..

BUT noted that it was "already my username" on ALL other wiki sister projects.

Thus:

For that reason (and for that reason) ONLY: I had to "open" an apparently DUPLICATE account.

IT IS NOT DELIBERATELY CREATED as a "duplcate" .. but as a one-off.

However the website of Wikinews - did then automatically log me in as such .. everywhere else.?

Something that I DID NOT WANT IT TO DO ..

And thus: I had absolutely no control over that action.

It was only created here (by myself) for my use -- solely for whenever I am "inside" - Wikinews.

Note: My Central Otago, NZ "flag" (above my ~~Tildes) refers directly to the "Wikipedia" Categories

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedians_in_New_Zealand

Over on en.Wikipedia & not to those of "Wikinews" shown below in Categories:

(As in here: "that page does not exist"):

Therefore:

I now wish to continue with my required "HELPME" request - (which I am asking from Brian in NZ - via this template):

{{helpme}}

Attention: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Brian "PLEASE HELP A KIWI IN NEED"

I am in dire need of your urgent assistance in dealing with an issue of "unjustified COLLATERAL DAMAGE blocking" that has been placed upon my page of: User:QUIX4U at Wikipedia: (resulting from a "blatant" unjustified blockade - of collateral damage, performed after an unfounded accusation, by an apparent "Wikipedian" vandalizing editor, whom is therein "named" on my MAIN userpage: as the "Blocker" - of my "kiwi" User:QUIX4U page).

Pease help me.

I do not know what to do...

As I can prove beyond any shadow of doubt (via literally hundreds of published articles worldwide on my "verbose" username QUIX4U) that I have never, ever, been a party to any "socked puppetry", or whatever it is that the Wikipedian "accuser" - has accused me of doing.

I am "only" a singular KIWI (ex_farmer) .. whom can only type with "one finger on each hand" - using a very worn wilreless keyboard that is nearly un-usable as virtually NONE of these black buttons have any identifying "character" (white ID paint) left upon them.

I am also a WINZ Invalids beneficiary of limited funds .. and thus cannot purchase the required NEW KEYBOARD that will do as it's asked.. instead ..Ii have to keep trying to type.. on this near useless one, as I am not only invalided, but I am FAR SIGHTED, dyslexic, & autistic - as well as having absolutely POOR typing skills .. let alone also being compounded by the fact "that I type as I think" .. in a near continual stream .. !!! (User:Mr.Choppers on Wikipedia has advised me that it's a form of "conscious thought streaming" .. or some such method of always-on "typo" thing)

My User_talk:QUIX4U details exactly how exasperated I have now become - with the implied insinuation of total guilt, WITHOUT PROOF.

When NONE has ever been proven .. simply because it never will be able to be proven. In fact the reverse is more likely better provable (as I am fully innocent)

I AM NOT A SOCK PUPPET.

I am: QUIX4U (CEO of QUIX - NZ) www.QUIX-NZ.com

And I am a natural born Pakeha (whom is still): Residing in "Roxburgh_NZ". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roxburgh,_New_Zealand

  This user is from Central Otago, NZ.

µTemplate Central Otago, NZ





P.s.. I also talk as fast as I type .. something I must also try to "curb" as it makes for extremely LONG intros into my many youtube Educational Videos .. especially those of old vintage machinery etc, such as on the old 1934 Renualt Crawler Tractor (self-laying-tracks) - that my "son" is a part owner of .. the ONLY ONE IN OPERATIONAL EXISTANCE - in the entire world..

Plus..

I have some 300 videos or more .. worldwide .. almost all of which also include several "minutes" of yabba yabba (yadie yah) on them (me - talking) -- & In almost the exact same fashion that I write (upon) my many hundreds of websites around the world.

Thus: on Wikipedia - I only have the 1 = being just a SINGLE ACCOUNT. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:QUIX4U

QUIX4U2 (talk) 20:39, 19 May 2012 (UTC)Reply


  • Errr, please be more concise. And, please work out what you want/need done.
That might be: This account renamed out the way here on Wikinews, and you then re-unify your normal login with SUL.
If you go and read the various meta pages on meta:SUL, then you can probably work out what's gone wrong. And, get a ritalin prescription [;-)], trying to figure out what's wrong aint going to happen with the above "printed ADAH". --Brian McNeil / talk 13:15, 20 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi - I'm terribly sorry that my meaning was unclear (as I tend to splurge all my problems in a rush - apparently it has something to do with my Klienfelters/ asburgers condition). No - what I am having greatest difficulty with is that I desperately need the assistance of a Beaurocrat - and as you are a New Zealander (as am I) it is easiest for you to actually verify my honesty and my credentials directly from within NZ. The fact that I have contacted you via wikinews is tbecause that's where you are apparently most active (rather than on the main Wikipedia site) I am desperately trying to "clear" my name & my username (one and the same here in NZ) for the nasty way in which an abusive "blocking' editor has attacked my good character and my NZ username .. by way of "insinuating" that my so-called "style" of typing .. & or editing (as being a NEW wikipedian editor "and thus still a learner" with autusic & dyslexic (OldMan) learning difficulties, as well as a fualty wornout leyboard .. does NOT help that situation either).

Two years ago/. I read on wikipedia that they wanted people to "become" editing members .. and to "help" wikipedia by supplying missing "verifyable" information.

I did that. I also "read" that one MUST NOT give one's own "perasonal name .. but ot "use an annonymous username .. but one may still use a world wide acceptable one ... that people can identify where in the world one is living.

I therefore "thought" it prudent -- to ONLY supply the NZ town "name" - here in NZ .. as my Wikipedian "name".

However.. within a few rough edits .. (given that I tend to be extremely verbose even at the best of times.. and given that - with my difficulties in even "trying" to identify WHICH of these worn out 9non legible) keys are .. I NEVER EVER take my eyes from the wireless keyboards as i try to type. Thus .. when I finish .. I also "tend' to NOT check .. nor do i even know where to "access" a thing called spelling shecker.? Thus: I do as i have always been told by (experts) ./. and that is .. always save your work ASAP. That's what i have been doing. BUT. a user (i call it (ab)user .. as that's how i was treated.. no respect, no attempt to "ask me" .. no attempt to even HELP ME (I tried asking using templates I found that asked politely for me) .. No. User:Fabian .. simply assumed that I was in some manner or form "related" to another user based somewhere in the Atlantic regions .. and proceeded to INSTNTLY remove all of my communication accesses from wikipedia. Thus: for nigh n two years.. i simply did NOT bother uploading ANY of the vital "missing" information .. that I & as it turns out I alone (sadly) am the ONLY PERSON in the world to have this) have a FAMILY PHOTO .. of Lieutenant Colonel David Cossgrove (my Mum's GRANDAD). It was "thankfully" uploaded by myself .. into "commons" .. but i did NOT know how to get it "into a correct page .. nor did I 9I still don't know how) .. to actually wikipedia create .. a specific "politically corrrect .. MAIN PAGE .. so i asked in TALK/TALK pages .. mostly that of my OWN.. However. By being permantly BLOCKED.. And falsely accused of "being" in some form .. "related" to a previous abuser .. by a name of ATLANTIC.DEEP ? Fabian did maliciously "label" my NZ TOWN "username" .. as a ? Socketed puppet. "thing". (I am a god created Eunuch - as as such -- I try my damnedest to ALWAYS explicitly TELL THE TRUTH ... as often as I can).

However .. recently -- someone 9offsite0 suggested that my 1978 Mitsubishi Colt T-120-Y "truck" .. is almost a vintage .. and that I should upload all of the details that I have (including the scans of the JAPANESE publications of Mitsubishi Motors Workshop/ parts & service manuals that I hjave for that .. as well as the "model photos .. and anything related.. I did that -- on a special Wiki Tractors & trucks website.

Then.. a Wikipedian edito of some note.. also contacted me .. and "asked" if I could upload bigger photo's onto WIKIPEDIA.

As i aready KNEW .. that Roxburgh_NZ (a town in Central Otago, South Island of NZ .. was already a "bnned" username on Wikipedia.. I "came" back to WIKIPEDIA .. not as myself .. a resident of Roxburgh_NZ .. but as a "hidden" representitive of my NZ Company -- Hinge Services Central Limited.. and "thus: .. assumed that I had ACTUALLY not breached any "rule" of Wikipedia .. by DELIBERATELY NOT MISREPRESENTING MYSELF.

However.. when I "asked" Fabian .. as to WHY a first time editor .. was permanently BANNED simply because of their almost un-intelligible typing  ? I was INSTANTLY BLOCKED -- with the same insulting "reason" being given.. I AM NOT - and never have beeen ANYONE 's sock. I am also "not" a puppet. And I detest the inference.

Would you "please" as a Wikipedian Beaurocrat.. PLEASE find out .. WTF is going on over there.

I would "like' to abide by the administrator's request (User:Mr.Choppers) .. to upload a LARGER FILE into wikipedia .. of my 1978 CAB/CHASSIS wide deck flatdeck .. 1978 Mitsubishi COLT truck..

As my adopted "SON" is "also" a 3rd owner (3 own it) AND as he is the ONLY NZ RESIDENT OWNERT.. - i have personal access to -- AND A VIDEO & STILL PHOTOS OF.. The "worlds" ONLY WORKING 1934 Renuslt Crawler Tractor . .. But I'm be damed if wikipedia can "have" any access to that -- whilst I am being "falsely accused of vandalism".

As you are also a NZ Citizen. It will be extremely easy -- for you .. as a BEAUROCRAT of Wikipedia .. to "actually do the due diligence .. that (ab)USER:Fabian .. obviously HADS NOT DONE.

google me..

QUIX4U

I am everywhere on NZ's intwernet - as well as across some 250 websites worldwide. (done in just the 4- 6 yrs that I have been hammering the keys of this useless (warehouse) PC's keyboard).

I am ALOS -- easily accessible by urself .. in NZ (as all you need do .. is call me direct on my landline only internal NZ 0800 (via my username) ie: 0800 QUIX4U.

Why -- oh WHY .. would someone .. whom has NO REASON TO LIE.. no reeason to decieve .. AND ALL THE PROVABLE EVIDENCE ..? AND a desire to "share" FREELY that evidence.. to the world.. WHY on earth.. would I want to "vandalise" the very site that "should" be a place to have been a trudstworthy place .. to "put such information.. Having been NOW twice treated with the UTMOST disrespect.. by (ab)user:Fabian .. over on en.Wikipedia.org ..? I am loath to release MY family's photo's and or my own photos 7 video's (VISUAL EVIDENCE via a Nokia Cellphone Camera .. that cannot be altered .. surely IS verifyable proof .. of OLD VINTAGE MACHINES ... such as a 3 wheel OLD Ex-NZR Pull_Pull hand trolley .. that I purchased from the NZR - in 1972, or the MINI MOKE 1964 that was my deceased Uncle's .. or the 1934 Renualt Crawler tractor of my Son .. or my OWBN vintage machines.. WHY ON EARTH -- would I be a vandal -- oer someone's socked pupett?

I am ? currently (STILL) able --to edit ONLY my user:talk page..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:QUIX4U

But for how long I am uncertain .. Able to at least STILL ask wikipedian Administrators & Beauroxcrats .. for "HELP" .. in reolving this issue -- over on Wikipedia .. unlike my "town" good name -- (Roxburgh_NZ) was indefinitely permanently blocked)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Roxburgh_NZ

Oh and p.s.. Also extremely provable. I am "listed" in the NZ Govt register.. as a NZ Business.

AND .. my personal "USERNAME" is a brand I use .. in my own Company.

BUT --I am not here pushing ANY PART of my NZ Companies (PATENTED) "Gate hinge activities". I am only in Wikipedia .. to inform & give provable evidence .. of verifyable info.

And - I am a NZ Citizen (from birth).. I have only ever been to Australia twice.. (and that's it. I have NEVER been to the Atlantic.

I remain.. Highly confused (about how the editing protocols work on Wikipedia) .. Utrterly disgusted by the way User:Fabian has mistreated his authorities( towards me).. And 3/- (very) Extremely insulted by his insinuations.

  This user is from Central Otago, NZ.

µTemplate Central Otago, NZ



125.237.31.198 (talk) 03:51, 21 May 2012 (UTC) Template:User citizen New ZealandReply



125.237.31.198 (talk) 03:51, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oh & p.s.. (I almost forgot)..

WIKIPEDIA is "supposed" to be all about (Verifyable) PROOF.

Thus .. my "stuff" ? YES - It's provable.

My "Son's 1934 Renualt Crawler Tractor" which is on PUBLIC DISPLAY (and permanently stored) at the: Tapanui Vintage Machinery Museum, West Otago.. NZ

(just google) Renualt Crawler Tractor ... QUIX4U ... youtube. (or goto) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sltsZaFmS4

& MORE PROOF.

Also provable (my Great, Great Grandad):

Buried as he is at: Bromley Cemetary (here in Christchurch NZ). Got check the photo that I uploaded (when I was "signed in" as Roxburgh_NZ) Leiutenant Colonel David CossgroveMY PHOTO (My "photo" - that some "kind" editor .. (obviously NOT User:Fabian) .. whom did "shift" for me .. onto a page which they themselves had "made" in Wikipedia "earlier" for him:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Cossgrove

AND my "page" for him .. on FACEBOOK: Lieutenant Colonel David Cossgrove - DSO (NZ) is on Facebook

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lieutenant-Colonel-David-Cossgrove-DSO-NZ/165956883481479

AND: Read (in Facebook) of whom the ONLY FRIEND whom is: .. on that Facebook page:

1 Friend Likes Lieutenant Colonel David Cossgrove - DSO (NZ)

....Recent Posts by Others See all..

Liked by: QUIX - NZ (Hinge Services Central Limited) - 1999 3 friends (of QUIX4U) also like this...

& OMG .. That's me. (also on Facebook) http://www.facebook.com/QUIX4U

Or.. (my username) on Twitter.com & Wordpress.com, & Google.com/profiles/QUIX4U AND on youtube. As well as even on my "own" named NZ website. "www . QUIX4U . com"

So why on earth .. given that I ONLY use "my OWN username" ... almost EVERYWHERE I GO .. on the entire world wide web.. Why would i want to "ever' be associated with the Atlantic ocean.

IT AIN'T EVEN NEAR NZ.. let alone even "liked" by me.

But.. If Wikipedia wants to break it's OWN rules of etiquette (in just "how" BAAAD their administrators can be) - by DELIBERATELY insulting ... NEW EDITORS .. whom actually have good info for offer..

Then why should I bother.. ever doin g anything in the future.. by way of "giving" Wikipedia any of what OONLY I have in my possesion ... ? At all.

After all -- i'm absolutely certain .. with MY "huge" footprint on the web.. I 4sure.. DO NOT NEED to "gift" anything to a website where an administrator HAS DELIBERATELY OFFENDED ME (such as wikipedia has). Why should I bother giving "willingly thereafter .. for use of ANY of my info .. Without trying to defend my honesty 7 my integrerty.. And or of :asking: for some form of explanation 9let alone an appology -- which I am almost certain that a certain Wikipedian Administrator whom has abused their blocking rights .. and whom will not ever bother giving).

It was only a "common coutesy" that I wanted to "share' my info -- in the first instance.. thet even lead me into Wikipedia .. as a newbie editor.

I sure as ShZ|t .. did NOT come in here - just to be "blocked" (and thus abhorrently "insulted" as well). QUIX4U2 (talk) 05:15, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

My I politely ask you Brian .. as a Beaurocrat of en.WIKIPEDIA.org Is it OK if you continue "helping" me .. fro within my Wikipedia user_talk page.. over on Wikipedia (from now on)

via: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:QUIX4U

As I would "like" to remove my footprint here (in wikinews) as well as all of this "asking for help" [content] of this my ancillory usertalk page - to deliberately and permanently remove this: from public view.. But only if you wouldn't mind please.

Thus: as a way of my humblest appology .. at my verbose rambling conscious stream of thought typo .. Please also accept that -- which I gift to everyone be they simply walking in the streets or chatting over the telephone, sent via txt or email ..

A kiwi innovation that "crosses many borders" (& literally in many a "tourist / hitchhikers" pockets too).

My special:

"E_Flowers4U"

It's another google thing.

Cheers.. and thus Au revior from here.

QUIX4U2 (talk) 05:27, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Um? Is that the BRIAN .. Beaurocrat -- from NZ .. or an entirely "different" Beian.. As I "specifically asked for "BRIAN" (period) -- "no surname".

ie: http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/User:Brian

Not ? http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/User:Brian_McNeil

Cheers.. oh I forgot the template didn't i...

Ok .. lets C ? what was it again..? ((helpme)) hangavout.. I'll go jump the puddle 7 see if I can't find it in the earlier half of this page.. BBS. QUIX4U2 (talk) 05:41, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

? Ok found it.. BRIAN ... (no surame) ie: Wikipedian Beaurocrat from 2005 in New Zealand.

& ? It would now appear .. the "BRIAN" whom is not the Scottish "McNeil" variant thereof

ie: Brian: [quote] Brian (formerly Brian New Zealand), or for short BNZ (yes, like the Bank), is a New Zealand Wikinewsie on Wikinews, and discovered Wikinews during the 2005 New Zealand General Election. In January 2006 I became a accredited reporter. And as of February 2006 I was created an Admin, and in 2007 I became a Bureaucrat -- please feel free to leave a message on my talk page if I can assist you in some way! [unquote] Oh & p.p.ps.s.ps. ? or whatever a 4th & 5th p.s. is supposed to be? No- i cannot "leave" a message on your "User_talk:Brian" (wikinews):Userpage As for some silly reason .. it's LOCKED" from being editied .. thus no -- i cannot leave you a message.

Which makes me wonder .. why tell people to "do" something .. that you know they cannot do.? (or as a mainlander kiwi -- am I "not" allowed to do that)? ...

So.. again .. from inside this silly "own user_talk page .. i ask again..?

Brian.

Attention: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Brian

Please "HELPME" with my request - (which I am asking from "Brian" in NZ - via this template):

{{helpme}}

Note: BRIAN Brian (formerly Brian New Zealand), or for short BNZ (yes, like the Bank), is a New Zealand Wikinewsie on Wikinews, and discovered Wikinews during the 2005 New Zealand General Election. In January 2006 I became a accredited reporter. And as of February 2006 I was created an Admin, and in 2007 I became a Bureaucrat -- please feel free to leave a message on my talk page if I can assist you in some way!

.. (not Brian.McNeil)? "PLEASE HELP A KIWI IN NEED"

QUIX4U2 (talk) 05:41, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hahaha -- just "spottted" ..that medical comment you put there ( inserted by the "McNeil" surname of the wrong BRIAN)

? Ritilan ..is a "prescription ONLY medication .. here in New Zealand.. That is "illegal" to just go & get .. Without one being diagnosed as actually "having" HDAD (by a NZ Registered medical practitioner)

Kleinfelter's Syndrome .. Does NOT in any way -- fall into that category. Oh sure.. i "appear to be on speed (which ritilan is actually) .. BUT I can assure you .. it has absolutely NOTHING to do with ritilan defficiency.. But rather a testosterone defficiency, as well as the "fact" that I type "very very slowly" with the forefinger of my lefthand & the 2nd finger of my Right hand.. all the time .. banging away at NON legible .. nearly black .. black wireless keyboard keys .. simply because i am too old & stingy to "bother" trying to figure out .. how to "re_insert" .. a new brand of keyboard "driver" thingie .. onto an old PC .. that is nearly full of data with next to m]=no memory space left for emails .. let alone NEW PROGRAMS ..(plus..? I wouldn't LOOK UP - even if I had a new keyboard.. (thus would still simply type like a crazy kiwi that I am .. amd simply SAVE whatever i hads typed.. as I know from past experience.. EVEN AFTER I have tried to re-read my own typo .. even I cannot "read" it most times.. so how do I then go back into my thoughts .. to try & remember wha I wrote .. as to do that --- simply begs me to wander ooff.. on a differemnt tasngent all together and totally confuse everyone .. or ? maybe that's why you suggested ritilan?>?

Oh I suppose I should "make' that an equals new thing.. Ok ..here goes.

Re: "Brian.Mcneil" & Your RITILAN "quotation" (as an answer for my troubles above.!)

edit

[quote]

  • Errr, please be more concise. And, please work out what you want/need done.
That might be: This account renamed out the way here on Wikinews, and you then re-unify your normal login with SUL.
If you go and read the various meta pages on meta:SUL, then you can probably work out what's gone wrong. And, get a ritalin prescription [;-)], trying to figure out what's wrong aint going to happen with the above "printed ADAH". --Brian McNeil / talk 13:15, 20 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

[unquote]

? QUIX4U2 (talk) 05:54, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re: Was told to go look at ? meta:SUL by Brian McNeil

edit
Wow .. is THAT where the information was "hidden" ..when i tried to LOGGIN here as "QUIX4U" -initially .. as it DID not tell me where the "prior existing" (MY USERNAME of QUIX4U was being used (but that cannot be accessed by one's OWN username as it was hidden) .. when I tried to login to wikinews with my Wikipedia login details.

Ah...

Well -- so it's call a "mata" something (wow) ..Ok .. So?

I accessed that [lnik] that you suggest I reseach - "now" .. and read there all about your META "thingie" .. and even though much of that (to me - and my addled old brains way of conscious streaming thought without much memory space left) .. looks as fuddled and as muddled (as my typo does to you)..

I didn't "merge" anything.

As:

HERE is what I did find..

I DO NOT NEED TO UNIFY ANY TWO USERNAMES - on TWO "separate" wikis.

I can keep both separate... (as I have done this very first time) I USED a 2nd version of my first username - (with it's different email address & different password) - to that of my "main" wikipedia account of "QUIX4U"

re: YOUR OWN META:? Instructions:

[quote] Users can still have differently named accounts on two sites; however, these accounts will not be linked for unified login. [unquote]

So?? For what reason did you go off tangent with that suggestion .. &/or for what reason did you attack my apparent "lack" oof sanity &/or "medical" situation .. with the insulting reference to (my possibly) "needing" a PRESCRIIPTION of: Ritilan ?

WITHOUT ACTUALLY HELPING WITH THE QUESTION THAT I HADS ASKED FOR HELP UPON.

?

QUIX4U2 (talk) 09:11, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • A question is usually constrained to a single sentence. Nobody here will read a dozen lines where most contain little, or no, information. I'm not going to read a massive missive searching for a question; I expect it put as a single sentence. --Brian McNeil / talk 13:00, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • To: User talk:Brian McNeil| Re: Ur response of: [quote] A question is usually constrained to a single sentence. Nobody here will read a dozen lines where most contain little, or no, information. I'm not going to read a massive missive searching for a question; I expect it put as a single sentence. --Brian McNeil / talk 13:00, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[unquote] - actually does nothing to address the problem - into which you have so blindly been drawn into -- and that is this: All the above (apparent gibberish) is very very specific when read in it's conscious streaming thought process -- in which that information was written. All of which of course.? Simply points to the you (the respondent) actually needing the required medication which you so painfully suggested that the original poster use.. and not the "original poster" themselves .. whom wrote all of that (deliberately written as "Conscious Streaming Thought Process" writtings.. which themselves were providing the information (above).. as actually -- when read correctly (in a form of "conscious streaming thought process for reader's intake of written information" .. that long speak rambling message above .. DOES NOT include any so-called questions - but are are in fact .. entirely retorical observations, and do NOT require direct answers, even though - to the untrained eye of many lessor individuals (into which catagory you have unfortunately now placed yourself) they appear to only be there.. "to prove a point". Sorry Brian.!Reply

WSTLNZ NZ / talk 125.237.45.15 (talk) 22:14, 8 January 2013 (UTC) Reply