AndrésSnape

Welcome to Wikinews

Getting started as a contributor How to write an article Pick something current? Use two independent sources? Read your sources before writing the story in your own words?. Do choose a unique title? before you start. Follow Wikinews' structure? for articles, answering as many of who what when where why and how? as you can; summarised in a short, two- or three-sentence opening paragraph. Once complete, your article must be three or more paragraphs. If you need help, you can add {{helpme}} to your talkpage, along with a question, or alternatively, just ask? Use this tab to enter your title and get a basic article template. [RECOMMENDED. Starts your article through the semi-automated {{develop}}—>{{review}}—>{{publish}} collaboration process.]

Welcome, AndrésSnape! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally. As you get more involved, you will need to look into key project policies and other discussions you can participate in; so, keep this message on this page and refer to the other links in it when you want to learn more, or have any problems. Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation   Used to contributing to Wikipedia? See here.

All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours. Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere. The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing. Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly.

The core policies Neutral point of view Cite sources Writing an article Content guide Style guide Reviewing articles

Places to go, people to meet Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion. There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project.

Find help and get involved The Water Cooler The Latest News The Newsroom Articles for deletion Audio Wikinews Recent Changes

Write your first article for Wikinews! Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it! It is recommended you read the article guide before starting. Also make sure to check the list of recently created articles to see if your story hasn't already been reported upon.

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 19:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Appeal?

Apart from this which is more like Wikipedia-specific. I shouldn't be banned for something I "suppossedly" did at Wikipedia, I did not harm WikiNews at all. And yes, I registered here just for explaining my point of view on Diego's issue (which it was kind of helpful), but I'm cautivated in all this "free press" spirit and such. Also, I should not be banned just for a policy which is maybe going to be done about "Would recommend, in somewhat of an exception to usual practice, that all CU-confirmed socks of this user on enWP also be blocked here. We can well-do without Master-Baiters from Encyclopedia Dramatica trying to disrupt process." until it is official rather than what an admin thinks. I am an EDiot and I showed a biased point of view, buut that is what the original post was about, to show opinions. I did not disrupt anything at all, I even made it faster because, for example, saying that Diego claiming to be hacked is probably a lie, which led to an official and sometimes accurate output from CheckUsers. AndrésSnape (talk) 22:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

• Congratulations! You don't deny you're predominantly active on ED.

"Master Inquisitor" versus "Master baiter"? I see little difference. I reviewed the odious page attacking Diego over on ED; on that basis alone, I doubt anyone on Wikinews who has seen Diego do good work would want someone with an involvement in such a project "helpfully" injecting their twist on events into a discussion between people who care how this project is run, and it's content handled.

So, no. You're not getting unblocked. You have zero desire to contribute content to this project, and an admitted interest in injecting disruption wherever the opportunity arises.

By all means, feel free to comment here on your - currently unlocked - talk page. That you're associated with Encyclopedia Dramatica, blocked on Wikipedia, and viewed with suspicion by some here, is clear to all. That dramatically lessens the drama-inducing influence you may have, regardless of claimed unfamiliarity with the English language. --01:08, 11 September 2012 (UTC)