April 5 already passed

yeah, which is kind of sad considering its essentially about us. Should we put a correction note? (announcement was http://techblog.wikimedia.org/2010/03/the-change-in-interface-is-coming/ )

No. It ain't our fault they can't get their shit together.

We probably should. What is it? {{correction}}?

hmmm...well it seems that the sources were properly summarized. See [1]. I'm not exactly sure what to do when the sources themselves turn out to be wrong after the fact

Tell the source they failed and correct ourselves?

Not necessarily: maybe the original date was April 5 and then got postponed???

The blog post was published on March 25; the article March 28.

Shoot...I didn't see that. The correction is in order then, yes?

I'll go ahead and do so.

And wouldn't lqt be great for the other talk namepsaces?

I personally don't like lqt for normal talk namespaces, i find it works better for conversation where there isn't an explicit goal, but thats just me. We can probably enable it on other talk namespaces using {{#useliquidthreads}}.

It doesn't work. I tried on my talk page.

Sorry I lied, I just looked up the configuration settings [1] (wmgLQTUserControlNamespaces being the relevent line) only works on namespace 102 (comments).

Can we poke someone to enable the user talk namespace?

Bleh, that banner looks hideous at the top.

Really for stories such as these, we should be reading our own announcements