April 5 already passed
Fragment of a discussion from Comments:Wikipedia and sister projects prepare new, easier interface
Shoot...I didn't see that. The correction is in order then, yes?
I'll go ahead and do so.
And wouldn't lqt be great for the other talk namepsaces?
I personally don't like lqt for normal talk namespaces, i find it works better for conversation where there isn't an explicit goal, but thats just me. We can probably enable it on other talk namespaces using {{#useliquidthreads}}.
It doesn't work. I tried on my talk page.
Sorry I lied, I just looked up the configuration settings [1] (wmgLQTUserControlNamespaces
being the relevent line) only works on namespace 102 (comments).