Talk:Wikinews interviews Mark Bunker, producer of anti-Scientology website 'XenuTV'

Logs

Logs as follows:

1. Log from the first (moderated) part of the interview
2. Log from the second (open, less moderated) half of the interview

Wow, reading through User:Martinp23/Log2, looks like it is basically completely useless, save for one or two lines from Mark Bunker. Can anyone say - Sporgery? Cirt - (talk) 02:08, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

There already a few people in #wikinews-interviews waiting for the next one. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 09:40, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

When will that be? Cirt - (talk) 12:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Check WN:SOON --Brian McNeil / ^talk 13:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Questions

Leave questions, except for those asked in the interview. The remaining Pre-asked questions not answered, will be sent to Mr. Bunker VIA e-mail to answer. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 03:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

And then the unused stuff will be cleaned up/removed? Cirt - (talk) 03:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes as time goes on...we need to weed out the questions that have already been asked, remove those and make a list of the ones that were not asked, and send them off to Bunker. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 03:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay - great work so far. Cirt - (talk) 03:15, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Questions have been sent off. I told him no rush because there are A LOT still.

Missing part?

This doesn't seem right: from User:Martinp23/Log1.

1. What will it take to get Congressional Hearings to review the Church of Scientology?
2. 16 Feb 2008 21:39:46<@brianmc> Specifically, their tax-exempt status
3. 16 Feb 2008 21:40:02<+Mark_Bunker> We have the amazing ability to convince outselves about anything. Our government is protecting us by wiretapping our phones and getting us into a needless war while letting the real terrorists regroup. But - hey -we were scared and went along with it.

There seems to be a part missing in the log. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 19:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

I will have to look over it, but it might be the lag caused him to see a later part of the question, and probably did not get to answer the other part. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 19:41, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

It seems that part got lost with the joins and leaves...and he didn't answer it. Not sure how to proceed with this section. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 20:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Synopsis

Can someone write up a nice synopsis for this? The papragraph I did is not really enough. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 21:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Sources for Intro

What are the sources used for the Intro section? Cirt - (talk) 03:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia and IRC. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 03:49, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay. Cirt - (talk) 04:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

editprotected

{{editprotected}} there seems to be a problem with the question 'What is the next step we should take in raising the general public's awareness of the atrocities of the "Church" of Scientology. Also, besides www.xenutv.com, what are some other, reputable, citable sources of information on these abuses?'. Kayau (talk · contribs) 11:42, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Done I changed the formatting. Please check it. --InfantGorilla (talk) 20:58, 12 October 2010 (UTC)