Talk:Wikinews interviews Mark Bunker, producer of anti-Scientology website 'XenuTV'

Latest comment: 13 years ago by InfantGorilla in topic editprotected

Logs

edit

Logs as follows:

  1. Log from the first (moderated) part of the interview
  2. Log from the second (open, less moderated) half of the interview

Wow, reading through User:Martinp23/Log2, looks like it is basically completely useless, save for one or two lines from Mark Bunker. Can anyone say - Sporgery? Cirt - (talk) 02:08, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

There already a few people in #wikinews-interviews waiting for the next one. --Brian McNeil / talk 09:40, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
When will that be? Cirt - (talk) 12:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Check WN:SOON --Brian McNeil / talk 13:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Questions

edit

Leave questions, except for those asked in the interview. The remaining Pre-asked questions not answered, will be sent to Mr. Bunker VIA e-mail to answer. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 03:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

And then the unused stuff will be cleaned up/removed? Cirt - (talk) 03:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes as time goes on...we need to weed out the questions that have already been asked, remove those and make a list of the ones that were not asked, and send them off to Bunker. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 03:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Okay - great work so far. Cirt - (talk) 03:15, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Questions have been sent off. I told him no rush because there are A LOT still.

Missing part?

edit

This doesn't seem right: from User:Martinp23/Log1.

  1. What will it take to get Congressional Hearings to review the Church of Scientology?
  2. 16 Feb 2008 21:39:46<@brianmc> Specifically, their tax-exempt status
  3. 16 Feb 2008 21:40:02<+Mark_Bunker> We have the amazing ability to convince outselves about anything. Our government is protecting us by wiretapping our phones and getting us into a needless war while letting the real terrorists regroup. But - hey -we were scared and went along with it.

There seems to be a part missing in the log. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 19:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I will have to look over it, but it might be the lag caused him to see a later part of the question, and probably did not get to answer the other part. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 19:41, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
It seems that part got lost with the joins and leaves...and he didn't answer it. Not sure how to proceed with this section. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 20:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Synopsis

edit

Can someone write up a nice synopsis for this? The papragraph I did is not really enough. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 21:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sources for Intro

edit

What are the sources used for the Intro section? Cirt - (talk) 03:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia and IRC. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 03:49, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Okay. Cirt - (talk) 04:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

editprotected

edit

{{editprotected}} there seems to be a problem with the question 'What is the next step we should take in raising the general public's awareness of the atrocities of the "Church" of Scientology. Also, besides www.xenutv.com, what are some other, reputable, citable sources of information on these abuses?'. Kayau (talk · contribs) 11:42, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Done I changed the formatting. Please check it. --InfantGorilla (talk) 20:58, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Return to "Wikinews interviews Mark Bunker, producer of anti-Scientology website 'XenuTV'" page.