Talk:US National Park Service announces part of Yosemite National Park to close for days as flooding forecast
Review of revision 4723469 [Not ready] edit
Revision 4723469 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 05:28, 26 April 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Unfortunately, this fails review in its current state. Keep international readers in mind; where is Yosemite? (WN:5Ws). And who says it will be closed? Also, WN:FUTURE dictates we can't say things to be definite if they are only planned. Furthermore, just looking at the headlines of the sources, it's either "parts" or "most" of the park which will be closed. Attribution of claims is important. Lastly, please review WN:TENSE before resubmitting. Cheers, Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 4723469 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 05:28, 26 April 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Unfortunately, this fails review in its current state. Keep international readers in mind; where is Yosemite? (WN:5Ws). And who says it will be closed? Also, WN:FUTURE dictates we can't say things to be definite if they are only planned. Furthermore, just looking at the headlines of the sources, it's either "parts" or "most" of the park which will be closed. Attribution of claims is important. Lastly, please review WN:TENSE before resubmitting. Cheers, Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Thanks for the feedback edit
Thanks @SVTCobra for taking the time to review this article and to give me feedback. I think I've made the proper corrections and have resubmitted. Dr vulpes (talk) 09:59, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Review of revision 4724013 [Passed] edit
Revision 4724013 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:56, 28 April 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: @Dr vulpes: Good first article. Remember to use relative dating (e.g., yesterday) or days of the week when possible.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4724013 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:56, 28 April 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: @Dr vulpes: Good first article. Remember to use relative dating (e.g., yesterday) or days of the week when possible.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
- Somehow I lost the conversion template when correcting the temperatures. Heavy Water (talk) 17:23, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Heavy Water:. The conversion template doesn't work for differentials, only absolute temperatures. I tried to use is but if it is 10 degrees the output is 10 °F (−12.2 °C), yielding negative numbers. Anyway, why did you drop the part about the Merced River and the level which forces closures? Cheers,--SVTCobra 18:02, 28 April 2023 (UTC)