Talk:Skype suffers downtime in Europe

Review of revision 1242518 [Failed]

Revision 1242518 of this article has been reviewed by Bluegoblin7 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:29, 7 June 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: Sources? NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: No sources for article, automatic fail unfortunately. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1242518 of this article has been reviewed by Bluegoblin7 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:29, 7 June 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: Sources? NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: No sources for article, automatic fail unfortunately. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Yes, there are three sources? --Gryllida (% talk) 22:06, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

• I re-nominated for review; if you find these sources corrupt or insufficient in any way, you can just fail a review again with more details. Thanks, Gryllida (% talk) 22:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

  Man, I feel like an idiot! My complete apologies... I remember starting a review and looking down and not seeing any sources (or so I thought), and so I failed the article. Idiot, as they're quite clearly there. Please accept my apologies and I'm re-reviewing now! Goblin

• No problem, thanks. --Gryllida (% talk) 22:52, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Does this qualify as {{breaking}}? Updates on how the issue stabilizes may be possible. --Gryllida (% talk) 22:55, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Review of revision 1242838 [Failed]

Revision 1242838 of this article has been reviewed by Bluegoblin7 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:58, 7 June 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: I can't find any references to the time of the outage, except for "morning of June 7th" - this article states the 6th? The part about Efim Bushmanov also seems unrelated in terms of the outage and 'reverse engineering' quote, from the sources? NPOV: Passed Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I have actually spotted the sources this time! ;-) Overall it looks good on three fronts, though there's an issue with the sources/verifibility and a couple of stylistic items that I'll see to once the correction about the sources is made. Thanks. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1242838 of this article has been reviewed by Bluegoblin7 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:58, 7 June 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: I can't find any references to the time of the outage, except for "morning of June 7th" - this article states the 6th? The part about Efim Bushmanov also seems unrelated in terms of the outage and 'reverse engineering' quote, from the sources? NPOV: Passed Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I have actually spotted the sources this time! ;-) Overall it looks good on three fronts, though there's an issue with the sources/verifibility and a couple of stylistic items that I'll see to once the correction about the sources is made. Thanks. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Thank you for reviewing, these are the changes I did before re-nominating for next review:

1. Correct time.
2. Remove the news about reverse engineering, as their relation to downtime is slim.
3. Add one more source and information on stabilization of the issue in the evening.

--Gryllida 23:38, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Review of revision 1242871 [Passed]

Revision 1242871 of this article has been reviewed by Bluegoblin7 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:46, 7 June 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: There we go! Made a few copy edits and tweaks here and there, but the information is good and it's up to shape and ready for publication now. Thanks for addressing my concerns. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1242871 of this article has been reviewed by Bluegoblin7 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:46, 7 June 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: There we go! Made a few copy edits and tweaks here and there, but the information is good and it's up to shape and ready for publication now. Thanks for addressing my concerns. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.