Talk:Scientists use DNA analysis to track elephant poaching networks

A bit about my process:

I often get an idea for a Wikinews article by reading a mainstream news article from the New York Times, to which I have a subscription, or listening to one on the radio. The NYT is paywalled, and of course I can't post a link to a radio story. So if it looks like I'm looking for sources that fit ideas that I already have, that's because that's exactly what I'm doing. It's only that the ideas are coming from NYT or NPR and not from my own assumptions. So if you see the fact in the draft before you see the source that will come to support it, that's what's going on. Darkfrog24 (talk) 17:29, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Darkfrog24, this article is very well-written. But the ft source is paywalled, at least for me. Kindly replace it. :) 2006nishan178713^t@lk 10:13, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

It is hidden for now 2006nishan178713^t@lk 10:14, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

It looks like it's paywalled when I click on the link directly and not paywalled if I Google "DNA detectives use elephant tusk analysis to track ivory smugglers" and then click in from the results. Fortunately, the study itself and the other sources >2. I only added the Financial Times for good measure. Darkfrog24 (talk) 13:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Yeah that's strange 2006nishan178713^t@lk 17:17, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Review of revision 4662142 [Passed]

Revision 4662142 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 07:22, 18 February 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Please use updated source templates. Removed unnecessary wiki- & visible text with no otherwise relation. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4662142 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 07:22, 18 February 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Please use updated source templates. Removed unnecessary wiki- & visible text with no otherwise relation. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Source

Please replace the author of the Local 8 news with CNN. Publisher as 8 is enough. --JJLiu112 (talk) 07:25, 18 February 2022 (UTC)