Talk:Mockumentary Mister America has world premiere
Original reporting
edit@Koavf: you tagged this as being a piece of original reporting. Can you post your notes here? Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 13:44, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: c:Category:Mister America film premiere includes photos and audio that support every claim in this article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:11, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Review of revision 4519102 [Not ready]
edit
Revision 4519102 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:59, 5 October 2019 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 4519102 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:59, 5 October 2019 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- Original reporting: who was in attendance, what was discussed on the panel. Sources are all shared in the form of audio and pictures at c:Category:Mister America film premiere. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:12, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Koavf: Please explain. Did you attend this event? What were the circumstances under which these materials were gathered? --Pi zero (talk) 17:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Pi zero: Check your email. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:33, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- I have (btw) received the aforementioned email. Have not yet had a chance to process it; mean to do so reasonably promptly. --Pi zero (talk) 16:27, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm also working this weekend, so I don't have a lot of bandwidth. I appreciate you giving it a review. I would have written more if I had more time but I wanted to churn out an accurate, brief, piece of original reporting even if it meant that it wasn't comprehensive (i.e. trying to not make the perfect the enemy of the good). —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:33, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Having processed the private communication, I'm comfortable with the bona fides of the materials on Commons. --Pi zero (talk) 16:56, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Presuming there's nothing else in the notes needed for review, I am going to start. --SVTCobra 22:38, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Having processed the private communication, I'm comfortable with the bona fides of the materials on Commons. --Pi zero (talk) 16:56, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm also working this weekend, so I don't have a lot of bandwidth. I appreciate you giving it a review. I would have written more if I had more time but I wanted to churn out an accurate, brief, piece of original reporting even if it meant that it wasn't comprehensive (i.e. trying to not make the perfect the enemy of the good). —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:33, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- I have (btw) received the aforementioned email. Have not yet had a chance to process it; mean to do so reasonably promptly. --Pi zero (talk) 16:27, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Pi zero: Check your email. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:33, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Review of revision 4519439 [Passed]
edit
Revision 4519439 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:51, 7 October 2019 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4519439 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:51, 7 October 2019 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
- The phrasing seems reasonable to me. --Pi zero (talk) 01:18, 7 October 2019 (UTC)