Talk:Earthquake strikes Aksu Prefecture, Xinjiang Region, China; no casualties reported
Review of revision 4707337 [Passed] edit
 |
Revision 4707337 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:35, 2 February 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Endeavour in future to have two independent sources, independent insofar as they aren't explicitly funded by the Chinese government. This is innocuous enough, but as soon as it starts veering into politics, or social issues, &c...I say this only because immediately beside the 'China Daily' article is a section called 'Xi's moments'. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4707337 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:35, 2 February 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Endeavour in future to have two independent sources, independent insofar as they aren't explicitly funded by the Chinese government. This is innocuous enough, but as soon as it starts veering into politics, or social issues, &c...I say this only because immediately beside the 'China Daily' article is a section called 'Xi's moments'. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Edit edit
{{editprotected}} "No casualties or property were reported..." Needs a "damage". I'm surprised we all missed that. Heavy Water (talk) 23:45, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Done also changed "no" to "neither" as it is a compound sentence with "nor" later on. --SVTCobra 16:30, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
