Talk:Buddhist UNESCO World Heritage site in India suffers terrorist attack

Add discussion
Active discussions

BreakingEdit

Given the long review queue and the number of sources involved in this article, I would prefer it get stable before reviewing it. :/ It is a little intimidating for such a long article with so many sources and then fear of things in the article changing mid-review. --LauraHale (talk) 06:44, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[]

Review of revision 1945680 [Passed]Edit

Review of revision 1945688 [Passed]Edit

The word "terrorism" should be avoidedEdit

It's non-neutral. --Pi zero (talk) 15:48, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[]

I'll put that more strongly: This should not have been published with the terminology "terrorist attack". --Pi zero (talk) 16:23, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[]
Return to "Buddhist UNESCO World Heritage site in India suffers terrorist attack" page.