Talk:Barcelona defeat Manchester United in 2009 Champions League Final

OR notes

Watched the entire match on ESPN, live. Calebrw (talk) 22:33, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

This claim of OR brings to the fore the unresolved discussion at Wikinews:Water_cooler/policy/Archive/18#OR_and_Broadcast_report. Why is this OR when it seems that any and all of it can verifiably sourced? Watching something on TV doesn't seem that special, it is already filtered by whomever is broadcasting it. --SVTCobra 23:42, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

I agree, and have removed the tag (revert me if you disagree though). As I said at the water cooler discussion regarding this, I believe OR should be information obtained first-hand, not something that is taken from another news source (which this is). Watching the event on telly means that it is filtered for you, so it is already some form of a publication. Tempodivalse [talk] 23:51, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

The {{original}} was on the preloaded page. I just did the OR notes to go along with that. I agree and I'm not going to revert. Calebrw (talk) 15:32, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Sources

Please note that I got some information from w:UEFA Champions League 2009–10. Thanks. Calebrw (talk) 22:33, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Can {{Broadcast report}} be removed? Is everything (save the UEFA stats/fact from WP) sourced now? --SVTCobra 23:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

I guess. I everything that's in the article is sourced with either BBC or the UEFA.com source. Calebrw (talk) 21:22, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Review

Revision 825684 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:58, 29 May 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 825684 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:58, 29 May 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

CAT request

{{editprotected}} Please add the following categories to the article.

1. La Liga

14.139.242.195 (talk) 12:35, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Not done Connection seems weak. --Pi zero (talk) 15:42, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

{{wikify}}

Needs wikifying.
acagastya PING ME! 16:50, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

@Acagastya: Not done Please be more specific and resubmit. --SVTCobra 19:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

What the heck? Template clearly specifies what needs to be done. Those with w: link should be converted to {{w|, and all the important words should be linked. What do you mean by being more specific? If I were to list all the keywords to be linked, well, that really does not help, does it? I spend time listing all the words, and then an admin going through the source to do it, collectively spending twice the time. I would have done it myself, but well, since I can't, that's why the template.
•–• 18:17, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

{{w}}ized. There may, indeed, be additional keywords to link, especially toward the end, but I did a bunch of them. --Pi zero (talk) 18:12, 13 August 2019 (UTC)