Talk:Arabs react to Israeli debate on Jerusalem's Holy sites
I'm not sure how a gallery of long-existing sights fits a news article; it's not an encyclopedia. Just a thought that keeps coming to me recurrently after reading the thing a few times. —Gryllida 11:15, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Gryllida, Thank you for that comment! Actually, that is one reason for why I chose this news event because I knew that Wikimedia Commons had a deep archive of photos on all of those sites that are behind this debate. The photos provide depth that readers might chose to look at while others can ignore them. Just like we use links to let people dig into an issue behind the event, the photos perform a similar service for the visual people. I was amazed at how many photos Wikimedia Commons also has on Paco de Lucia! Crtew (talk) 16:33, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Review of revision 2431209 [Passed]
edit  |
Revision 2431209 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:00, 27 February 2014 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 2431209 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:00, 27 February 2014 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Hidden categories to add
edit
Done --Pi zero (talk) 00:03, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
categories to add
editCategory:Al-Aqsa Mosque {{editprotected}}—The preceding unsigned comment was added by عماد الدين المقدسي (talk • contribs)
- Removing this ep at the moment because one article is not enough for a category to exist.
acagastya PING ME! 12:27, 3 November 2017 (UTC)