Comments:Filesharing software distributor LimeWire ordered to close by court

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

10 years behind

People still use Limewire and other P2P programmes?

Mcchino64 (talk)18:08, 27 October 2010

Yes, they do. Programmes like eMule, Bearshare, Ares and things like them are still extremely popular, since they can search on a topic, unlike BitTorrent, which works by specific files and uses external search agents to find what you're after. It's a shame that LimeWire has been hit like this, but unfortunately I believe that this spells the "Beginning of the end" for existing P2P software. However, as LimeWire was based on an open-source project, Gnutella, I'm sure other agents will spring up quite quickly. We'll have to see where this goes, won't we?

BarkingFish (talk)20:38, 27 October 2010

Yup. I've also see a few attempts to use P2P software for legal purposes (especially Vuze (Azureus)), but most of them have fallen through over time. The few successful legal uses of P2P seem to rely on proprietary reskins of open source clients that only distribute the specific software that the company in question makes. IE, MMOG client distribution via P2P. The clients are *huge* (most new ones are at least 5 gigs, and range up to 60 gigs), so anything that saves the companies money on bandwidth is good for them.

Gopher65talk14:29, 29 October 2010

I normally get and share Ubuntu Linux distributions legally with the plain bittorrent client.

I also like the Miro video player which can share videos with bittorrent.

InfantGorilla (talk)15:23, 29 October 2010
 

bearshare is a virus

Dzponce12 (talk)22:35, 29 January 2012
 
 

Comments from feedback form - "Also one of the world's larges..."

Also one of the world's largest distributors of trojans, viruses and otherwise corrupt music files. Not your most ethical example of the digital age.

24.196.44.26 (talk)05:42, 10 November 2010

Another attempt at futility

I seem to recall a website called Napster that allowed people to download music for free getting shut down. Now you have to pay to use Napster but people can still download music for free. Now they have shut down LimeWire, but I guarantee you that people will still find a way to download music. Someone once said "As technology advances, so does the technology to fool it." As long as there are tech-savvy people who don't want to pay for music, they will find a way to get it for free. I can understand both sides of the debate, but they're trying to stop something that they can't control. It is, quite simply, an exercise in futility.

RemyCool (talk)17:44, 9 November 2010

The thing is, LimeWire LLC is a for-profit company. While there was a "free" version in addition to a paid Pro version, the costs of maintaining the free version were offset by software bundling and advertising (as well as being based off of an open-source project).

It's like the difference between copying DVDs for your friends vs. copying them to sell bootlegs. If you're just freely handing them out to friends your chances of getting caught are slim, but if you're going around selling them you're going to attract attention. While LimeWire wasn't selling the files, they were profiting from the technology which enabled the file sharing, thus painting a target on their back.

Alternative and free Gnutella/BitTorrent clients, on the other hand, use the same technology (often incorporating some of LimeWire Pro's features, freely) but are usually built around an index of open-source or indy projects that are legal to download. The software can still be used for infringement, but the developers should be able to avoid claims of inducement and are probably more trouble than it's worth to sue.

It looks like shutting down LimeWire was just the first step and the RIAA is preparing to seek damages, which I think is what they were really after.

Fishy c (talk)20:16, 9 November 2010
 

Comments from feedback form - "I think this really sucks"

I think this really sucks

71.194.79.55 (talk)20:46, 5 November 2010

Comments from feedback form - "Good article, nicely presented..."

Good article, nicely presented, very informative and helpful.

TT-97976 (talk)05:29, 29 October 2010

Comments from feedback form - "Great article, very informativ..."

Great article, very informative and helpful.

80.42.232.158 (talk)07:03, 28 October 2010