Wikinews:Admin action alerts/Archive 2

April 2005Edit

Protected pagesEdit

Done. Pingswept 02:57, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Done. Pingswept 02:57, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Amgine is vandalizing my articleEdit

Bottom Line; Now the article has been sitting in ongoing disputes with a tag the tagger(Amgine) admits is not true.

see his last "work" on this. (cur) (last) 01:54, 26 Apr 2005 Amgine (+ NPOV until I find the original dispute tag which had been removed again.) its still under the npov tag which he admits in not true.Will one of you please remove a tag the tagger admits is bullshit? Paulrevere2005 16:49, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

"Pope Benedict XVI's opposition to the Masonic Order and other "religious mysticism" goes back at least 22 years"


1.inserted crazily worded , not relavent or appropriate dispute before reading the article and without discussion.never tried to fix it.never addresssed DV's pointing out the dispute tag was factually wrong.

2. Arbitrarily deleted the article (removed the article to no location) ,claimed it was a catche error...finally put it into ongoing disputes.

3. yesterday slapped a npov tag on it while saying that was not the right tag,only temporary, and would be changed later.

Bottom Line; Now the article has been sitting in ongoing disputes with a tag the tagger admits is not true.

The integrity of the article tags is at stake here folks!Edit

I think he's trying to sucker me into breaking one of the wikinews rules. Paulrevere2005 11:52, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I can't see that anything here is concern for an admin. Editors just need to work out problems themselves. Dan100 (Talk) 17:21, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Dan100; quit stalking me.This isn't addressed to you. Paulrevere2005 19:31, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I tend to agree with Dan here. I also know for a fact it was read before any tagging was done. Please settle the disupte on the talk page. Lyellin 18:22, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This is'nt stalking Paul! Dan is entitled to give his view as a long time and very respected (by most) editor. Anyways Amgine is fully within his rights to tag your article because there is a dispute going on about it. → CGorman (Talk) 20:58, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
what is the dispute about? Amgine says its not really this just arbitrary? and if so isn't that a problem for the site? Also, if Dan100 was able to remove 2 tags uniltarily with no consensus at all from "US military investigation.." then can't I remove tags unilatarily as well? Paulrevere2005 22:47, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Where are the Wikinews Rules????Edit

I really need to read them.Where are they listed???? Paulrevere2005 22:31, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Policies and guidelines Pingswept 02:59, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)