User talk:Bddpaux/Citizens express both praise and worries over Texas rains

• 6/28/2014 1155am local time: Interviewed Dale Barnes at Old Main Street Farmer's Market in Chandler, Texas. He manages a small produce stand there (one of several there......the market is open about 3 days per week), selling a range of locally grown vegetables. Told me that some local growers have complained about recent excessive rain causing "rot or mildew" on some vegetables. Stated many vendors there are currently selling 60 - 80% of the produce their farms will produce right now. Also stated earlier this summer "A'lot of what was being sold was brought up from south Texas, but most of what's being sold right now has been grown right here locally." --Bddpaux (talk) 04:44, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

• The following are some notes I've taken in June......--Buddpaul (talk) 15:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

• • Raining hard in Tyler 6/12/2014 1000am - 1130am
  • Raining hard in Tyler 6/18/2014 400pm - 525pm
  • Light rain in Tyler 6/22/2014 1100am - 1120am
  • Raining hard in Tyler 6/23/2014 1045am - 1130am
  • Medium rain in Tyler 6/24/2014 120p - 140p
  • Light rain in Tyler 6/26/2014 1130am - 130pm
  • Light rain in Tyler 6/27/2014 1045am - 200pm
  • Light rain in Chandler 6/28/2014 1100a - 1125a

• 3:00pm Interviewed a Tyler man (while at UT-Tyler)....he stated: ""I'm not a farmer, but this rain has been making my yard grow so fast, I can barely keep it mowed."--Buddpaul (talk) 15:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

• The Lake Sam Rayburn comment is essentially mine......I've heard several news reports (over about the past 10 years) that mention its significance for water in Texas. --Buddpaul (talk) 15:41, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

• The Robert Fleming comment, those counties are located in central Texas. --Buddpaul (talk) 15:47, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

• I don't know what the heck happened on my image layout....it was fine a minute ago! Could the reviewer help tighten up the frame, please? --Bddpaux (talk) 15:53, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Review of revision 2726590 [Not ready]

Revision 2726590 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: A mix of factors; see below. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: For this type of article, I suggest the lede (and the article as a whole, of course) should clearly delineate how much of the commentary is regular folks Wikinews talked to and how much is, well, professionals in some sense or other (and,of course, what sort of folks and what sort of professionals). Although the lede should not be detailed, it should be specific. Remember, the lede is supposed to make the case for newsworthiness. "Some people in Texas commented on the weather" is weak because it's not specific and therefore doesn't impart a sense of newsowrthiness. On the other hand, something along the broad lines of "Professionals and ordinary citizens have commented on the weather; Wikinews talked to local farmers and citizens", or whatever, ought to be able to make the most of whatever potential for newsworthiness the material has. In this case, the lede is on the weak side. The reporter has remarked elsewhere they'd hoped to gather comments from more people; and per above, a strong lede could help to make the most of what is gathered. Review was (through a concatenation of circumstances) unfortunately sluggish on this; that didn't help, although, as usual with OR, the stronger the collection of comments the more robust the freshness. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 2726590 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: A mix of factors; see below. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: For this type of article, I suggest the lede (and the article as a whole, of course) should clearly delineate how much of the commentary is regular folks Wikinews talked to and how much is, well, professionals in some sense or other (and,of course, what sort of folks and what sort of professionals). Although the lede should not be detailed, it should be specific. Remember, the lede is supposed to make the case for newsworthiness. "Some people in Texas commented on the weather" is weak because it's not specific and therefore doesn't impart a sense of newsowrthiness. On the other hand, something along the broad lines of "Professionals and ordinary citizens have commented on the weather; Wikinews talked to local farmers and citizens", or whatever, ought to be able to make the most of whatever potential for newsworthiness the material has. In this case, the lede is on the weak side. The reporter has remarked elsewhere they'd hoped to gather comments from more people; and per above, a strong lede could help to make the most of what is gathered. Review was (through a concatenation of circumstances) unfortunately sluggish on this; that didn't help, although, as usual with OR, the stronger the collection of comments the more robust the freshness. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

• I moved the main article over to a sandbox, so this can be deleted. --Bddpaux (talk) 15:08, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Eh, simple enough to move to userspace, which also preserves the notes etc. --Pi zero (talk) 17:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)