I agree. As I recall, I fixed a problem or two of the same sort in the body of the article while I was reviewing it; but it's surprisingly easy, when reviewing an article, to miss a problem like this with the headline.
My immediate reaction (as seen above) was, yeah, that headline is not ideal. On further thought I'm not convinced it's partisan; it doesn't seem entirely accurate, though. The judge in this article didn't halt the ban, just part of it.
