Merely in the interests of clarity: diff.

Pi zero (talk)01:57, 7 June 2011

Is it really true that no one knows the difference between an psychologist and a psychiatrist? Gasp! Not even the esteemed bossman who knows everything? Perhaps some at wikinews need to read more carefully. Anyway, I'm gone. Not worth the energy Pi zero and others are taking to try to discredit me.

Mattisse (talk)02:08, 7 June 2011

I've met plenty psychologists, and psychiatrists, in my time. Lady, you're neither. No remotely competent psychologist would dig themselves as deep a hole as you have, nor utterly misinterpret the written word to the extent you have.

On the basis of your performance here, you wouldn't last past ninety seconds of questioning in court by a good lawyer.

You write good copy, I'll give you that. But, that's it. You don't seem to understand the deeper aspects of any news item you're covering, you lack any real political awareness, and you're yet another fan of flock wallpaper adorned with fluffy bunnies.

Come back when I've used up the last six of my nine lives. You can copyedit my obit.

Brian McNeil / talk02:28, 7 June 2011

Could you possibly be wrong? I do have a license and many years of graduate school, internships, and experience from a successful practice. I can prove if to a trustworthy person if you like, as my work, license etc. is public. Thanks for encouraging me to go. "You don't seem to understand the deeper aspects of any news item you're covering, you lack any real political awareness, and you're yet another fan of flock wallpaper adorned with fluffy bunnies." OK. I can say the same of you. But, of course, you are the bossman, so the correctness or misinformation you produce is never up to scrutiny. I have been told by those on wp that this was the case, and that everyone at wikinews was afraid to stand up to you. I guess you are saying good riddance to me. Unfortunately for wikinews. You have how many editors actually writing articles now? Five? Or am I exaggerating. The fact that you produce nothing except nasty put downs is good, I guess. No articles from you on a daily basis. Just your obvious self satisfaction at what you consider cleverness. It's pathetic, but so goes wikinews. Have you ever considered that much of what you post is pure self indulgence and not worth wading through to see if there is any actual useful information in your "cleverness"? Good bye.

Mattisse (talk)02:52, 7 June 2011
 
 

Oh dear, oh dear!

I've not got a defective memory! We've got a Wendy Mitty here.

Brian McNeil / talk02:13, 7 June 2011