Talk:Wikileaks publishes files on CIA hacking abilities

Review of revision 4293473 [Passed]

Revision 4293473 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:36, 8 March 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Other possibly-interesting aspects of this story, mentioned in the sources, include the possible connection to Russian interference in the election (though I'm not sure there was much about this in the sources), and the CIA's decision to leave US citizens vulnerable to exploits by keeping the exploits secret. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4293473 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:36, 8 March 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Other possibly-interesting aspects of this story, mentioned in the sources, include the possible connection to Russian interference in the election (though I'm not sure there was much about this in the sources), and the CIA's decision to leave US citizens vulnerable to exploits by keeping the exploits secret. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Correct this falsehood: WikiLeaks, the organization behind the Edward Snowden leaks

Please correct the falsehood in the first line of this article. It is well known that Edward Snowden did not leak via the Wiki Leaks platform, but instead insisted on applying journalistic scrutiny!

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Snowden#Global_surveillance_disclosures

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.215.62.92 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 19 March 2017‎

A {{correction}} seems warranted, but note that a Wikipedia article is of no use as a source. --Pi zero (talk) 17:05, 19 March 2017 (UTC)