Talk:WHO's reaction to H1N1 influenced by drug companies, reports claim

Is this ready for review.

Is this ready for review. Is there any changes that are needed? ~~ Mrchris (talk) 17:13, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1038181 [Passed]

Revision 1038181 of this article has been reviewed by RockerballAustralia (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 10:46, 6 June 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1038181 of this article has been reviewed by RockerballAustralia (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 10:46, 6 June 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Confusing sentence

World Health Organisation H1N1 guidelines, were issued in 2004, recommending countries to stockpile millions of doses of antiviral medication.

Any chance to make that clearer? Kayau (talk · contribs) 09:53, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

I tried my best to reword it. FYI you can feel free to make these changes yourself. The WN:Archive policy doesn't apply to style corrections. Benny the mascot (talk) 12:56, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Beware of the health companies striking back

The BBC article link which was critical was changed to an brown nose ABC news which is talking about how you need to get a vaccine.