Talk:Virginia man arrested for plotting to bomb Washington DC metro
Review of revision 1145072 [Failed]
edit
Revision 1145072 of this article has been reviewed by Rayboy8 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: You are allowed to copy quotes from the sources, such as: "and what type of shrapnel would cause the greatest amount of damage" instead of attempting to put the entire article in your own words. You will also have to re-word the article to avoid copyright infringement with CNN and Fox News. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1145072 of this article has been reviewed by Rayboy8 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: You are allowed to copy quotes from the sources, such as: "and what type of shrapnel would cause the greatest amount of damage" instead of attempting to put the entire article in your own words. You will also have to re-word the article to avoid copyright infringement with CNN and Fox News. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 1145149 [Passed]
edit
Revision 1145149 of this article has been reviewed by Nascar1996 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:34, 14 December 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Former issues have been adressed, and is now ready to be published. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1145149 of this article has been reviewed by Nascar1996 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:34, 14 December 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Former issues have been adressed, and is now ready to be published. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
How is this a news article at all?
editWhat am I missing? It appears that this is an article being published on the 14th about something that happened on the 6th. Seriously? --Pi zero (talk) 00:09, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Just been reported on by all major news agencies, FBI probably didn't let word out until they were finished with what they had to do. In this case I think it's ok. Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 00:17, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- I take your point. Ideally, though, there would be a clear indication in the lede of what it is that has happened just recently. --Pi zero (talk) 00:27, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll try to pop in some current details such as the trial date now. Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 00:30, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- I take your point. Ideally, though, there would be a clear indication in the lede of what it is that has happened just recently. --Pi zero (talk) 00:27, 15 December 2010 (UTC)