Talk:US state of Florida assumes control of Disney World's self-governing district
@Heavy Water, if you get some time, check this article. I thought you will have a review on it when you renamed the page. M:DRC (talk) 15:42, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- I probably will soon here. It was too late then. Heavy Water (talk) 15:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
NPOV & style
edit"wife of [the] state Republican Party chairman" What's his name? "The private-administration entity may also earn money" first of all, is private-administration re: the self-governing district, or the state government board? 'May' as in empowered to, or as in 'might'? "rising congressional success for a governor"??? Eh? "ability to bridge cultural and political differences". Nuance this, please. Also smaller grammar issues, formatting, ordering of paragraphs &c. JJLiu112 (talk) 16:08, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- @JJLiu112, I will see to it and changed it as possible. M:DRC (talk) 17:23, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Review of revision 4712435 [Passed]
edit
Revision 4712435 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: @DRC-B5: Some editing done for style, NPOV (vague statements and WN:FUTURE), and to correct the misleading statement that DeSantis singlehandedly enacted this law, which the legislature had equal responsibility for. Could also have been expanded. Copyright was very good, though. Nice internationalization of a complex, layered issue that has years of history. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4712435 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: @DRC-B5: Some editing done for style, NPOV (vague statements and WN:FUTURE), and to correct the misleading statement that DeSantis singlehandedly enacted this law, which the legislature had equal responsibility for. Could also have been expanded. Copyright was very good, though. Nice internationalization of a complex, layered issue that has years of history. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |