Talk:U.K. MPs' expenses to be investigated by police

Review

Revision 836822 of this article has been reviewed by brianmc (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:57, 19 June 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: No comments were left by the reviewer The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 836822 of this article has been reviewed by brianmc (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:57, 19 June 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: No comments were left by the reviewer The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

--Brian McNeil / ^talk 16:57, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Concerns

Some parts invoke WN:WEASEL, such as this sentence: "This in itself has provoked surprise and anger with the British public," which is unattributed. --SVTCobra 03:16, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Category

{{edit protected}}

Please add this article to Category:Daily Telegraph (United Kingdom). Please also remove the duplicate word "the" in front of the name of the newspaper at the start of the second paragraph. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 22:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Done --Pi zero (talk) 23:39, 23 September 2015 (UTC)