Talk:Tighten 'noose' so Osama can't operate: Obama

Copyright and Times reference

This sentence is a direct copy paraphrase of Baldwin's Times article:

He also cited the containment of al-Qa'ida as a major achievement of the past seven years.

There may be others, so please check carefully.

--InfantGorilla (talk) 08:59, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

I've changed that sentence. I also reverted the Times reference in the text. I've had a look at the article on the times website, and it's exactly the same as the one in The Australian. So I've revered it so it matches the sources section. --RockerballAustralia (talk)

09:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

I credited The Times in the sources section, as does The Australian, so it does match the sources section. If an AP writer says something, we don't credit it (in the body) to the New York Times that published the article, as far as I know, so I think mentioning The Times is proper, and I disagree with your reversion.

I had a couple of nits, but I think it is a great article. Thanks.

--InfantGorilla (talk) 12:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Try to make better use of local links and categories. I have added them. --SVTCobra 23:00, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Peer review

Revision 752944 of this article has been reviewed by Red Thunder (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Nice work, fixed a few typos. R.T. 11:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 752944 of this article has been reviewed by Red Thunder (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Nice work, fixed a few typos. R.T. 11:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.