Talk:Ten dead, nine injured as Super Typhoon Megi clears Philippines

Review of revision 1115871 [Passed]

Revision 1115871 of this article has been reviewed by InfantGorilla (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:51, 19 October 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: This was a helpful and timely update by Bobby122: well worth a new article. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1115871 of this article has been reviewed by InfantGorilla (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:51, 19 October 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: This was a helpful and timely update by Bobby122: well worth a new article. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Review of revision 1116188 [Passed]

Revision 1116188 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 08:56, 20 October 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1116188 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 08:56, 20 October 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

This was originally published as a self-publish

This article was originally published as as self-publish, by InfantGorilla (talk · contribs). I have read it, copyedited it, checked it over, and reviewed it, and then published it, again. -- Cirt (talk) 08:58, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

self-publish

• RE: Self-publish. That looks somewhat unclear to me. IG seems to have reacted to my prompting the original author regarding substantial developments meriting a new article. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 14:13, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

• Re: "IG seems to ...". I don't always watch RC that closely: I came to the same conclusion independently (if you believe that.)
• However, Cirt has a legit concern about whether my pattern of editing is appropriate in future. Please address that side of it at Wikinews:Water cooler/policy#‎‎Does making a new article from a prior existing and then publishing it count as a self-publish violation?

--InfantGorilla (talk) 15:35, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

published it again

Can we restore the date to Tuesday, please? The typhoon has sped up again as it moved out to sea (now 115 knots / 130 mph / 215 kph ) and probably other facts have been changed too. --InfantGorilla (talk) 09:47, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

I shouldn't say 'sped up': it has intensified, (and it is moving more slowly, so may make landfall on Friday or Saturday. JTWC issued 2 new weather forecasts.) --InfantGorilla (talk) 09:52, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Update filename

Would someone please update the image to the filename File:Super_Typhoon_Megi_Oct_18_2010.jpg as a replacement file will be the preferred image, and the existing file removed File:Megilandfallfinal2010.jpg. Thx. Billinghurst (talk) 11:16, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Done --Pi zero (talk) 20:20, 11 November 2010 (UTC)