Talk:Study: Arctic ice could be gone by 2020

Sorry about that! Had an edit conflict. The paragraph was fine as it was. :) Jcart1534 23:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Dupe source?

Is the "The Age" source the same as the "Reuters" source? --SVTCobra 23:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Probably, but The Age cuts some of it off. The Reuters direct source has a bit more which The age did not. DragonFire1024 23:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

So shouldn't we remove "The Age" source? --SVTCobra 23:44, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes could be removed. The Age is reprinted from Reuters. Indicated at bottom of article. Jcart1534 23:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

I removed it. --SVTCobra 23:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Photo

Love the photo, BTW! Jcart1534 23:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

I wanted to look for a good one :) I love flickr :) DragonFire1024 23:54, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Chart on the left

The chart on the left of the article is in a very odd perspective... I do not like it because it makes the data look even more alarming. I am not contending that without the odd perspective the line is straight across, but the rate of warming is misconstrued by the odd perspective. If there is another version of this same chart with natural perspective, I would like to see it replace this one. I think the chart has good information, but its rhetoric is unmistakable, even if unintentional. 129.42.161.36 15:20, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Category

Would like to add a category to a number of arctic related news articles to begin a wikinews Arctic portal to complement and support the Wikipedia Arctic portal and wikiproject. Do I use this procedure for all arctic news articles? Kind Regards [[User:SriMesh|SriMesh]] | [[User talk:SriMesh|<small>talk</small>]] (talk) 00:37, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Done -- IlyaHaykinson (talk) 18:28, 24 August 2008 (UTC)