Verifiability: Not ready: No sources. No OR documentation, and OR requires extensive documentation plus a reporter with a previously earned reputation here.
Style: Not ready: This is much too short, both in paragraphs and in total text. The lede is not written for an international audience; don't treat the headline as part of the lede, so the lede has to say what part of the world this was in. No personal injury was reported by/to whom? Not sure what "some care were damaged" means. Btw, is that 13:00 local time?
If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.
Verifiability: Not ready: No sources. No OR documentation, and OR requires extensive documentation plus a reporter with a previously earned reputation here.
Style: Not ready: This is much too short, both in paragraphs and in total text. The lede is not written for an international audience; don't treat the headline as part of the lede, so the lede has to say what part of the world this was in. No personal injury was reported by/to whom? Not sure what "some care were damaged" means. Btw, is that 13:00 local time?
If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I feel I worked too much on this article to be able to review/publish this article. But as I speak fluent Danish, I can certify that Elgaard's original reporting is corroborated by the additional sources. Cheers, --SVTCobra01:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
This was, of course, quite challenging since I don't know Danish (though it's Germanic and uses a reasonably English-like alphabet, all of which helps); I might well not have had enough confidence to attempt it if not for the additional safety factor provided above by SVTCobra. I did a sanity check regarding later developments via google news aggregator (Danish), which turned up nothing more recent than the 1st (though also, not encouragingly, only turned up one article from the 1st, which wasn't either of the ones cited here). I struggled over the question of the extent of the wind (noting, this was first submitted as OR), and that aspect really wasn't ideally placed at the start of the lede. There were a few details I backed off on a bit due to difficulty determining clear support from the sources, I smoothed out the tense a bit (we don't know the current status of any of it, only the past status), and the {{w}} template has a sister parameter that can be used to point it at a different-language Wikipedia (or Wikisource, or whatever).
This is pretty minimal in length. It's not a very big story, in relevance, either, somewhat marginal as local stories go; but we do have an original photo of it. We don't get a lot of news from Copenhagen, and it is a first submission.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
This was, of course, quite challenging since I don't know Danish (though it's Germanic and uses a reasonably English-like alphabet, all of which helps); I might well not have had enough confidence to attempt it if not for the additional safety factor provided above by SVTCobra. I did a sanity check regarding later developments via google news aggregator (Danish), which turned up nothing more recent than the 1st (though also, not encouragingly, only turned up one article from the 1st, which wasn't either of the ones cited here). I struggled over the question of the extent of the wind (noting, this was first submitted as OR), and that aspect really wasn't ideally placed at the start of the lede. There were a few details I backed off on a bit due to difficulty determining clear support from the sources, I smoothed out the tense a bit (we don't know the current status of any of it, only the past status), and the {{w}} template has a sister parameter that can be used to point it at a different-language Wikipedia (or Wikisource, or whatever).
This is pretty minimal in length. It's not a very big story, in relevance, either, somewhat marginal as local stories go; but we do have an original photo of it. We don't get a lot of news from Copenhagen, and it is a first submission.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
