Talk:Samsung releases its first tablet computer

Review of revision 1089083 [Failed]

Revision 1089083 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:35, 5 September 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: "Apple was concerned about the appearance of the Galaxy Tab on the market" - cannot verify. I also cannot verify that a TV cable is included, only that it can stream to a TV, NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Please not the work done to bring this article up to decent standards of English, NPOV-fixing and the fact that I already changed one factual inaccuracy. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1089083 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:35, 5 September 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: "Apple was concerned about the appearance of the Galaxy Tab on the market" - cannot verify. I also cannot verify that a TV cable is included, only that it can stream to a TV, NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Please not the work done to bring this article up to decent standards of English, NPOV-fixing and the fact that I already changed one factual inaccuracy. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1089477 [Passed]

Revision 1089477 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:05, 6 September 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1089477 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:05, 6 September 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Image deletion

Image is submitted for deletion here as a photo containing non-free elements (on the phone screen). It may be useful to either replace with a free alternative or leave a proper note about missing image, whatever is better by experience and policies. Gryllida 10:58, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Looks like a decent candidate for local upload; Amgine (talk · contribs) is an expert on this sort of stuff. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 11:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

• Local upload, no questions there - it is an integral part of the article. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 11:25, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

  <blink> - Amgine | t 12:50, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

  en.wn is pretty much wall-to-wall expert tasks, and most folk who've been here a while are expert in something. Hence my interest in software support for expertise management, which I see as the viable future of the wikimedian movement. --Pi zero (talk) 13:02, 25 September 2013 (UTC)