Talk:Queensland cab conversations to be recorded
Review of revision 1227133 [Failed]
edit
Revision 1227133 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: 1. Writing tone and structure is not very clear. The article contains a few dozens of short paragraphs which are weakly related to eachother other than by having a common topic. 2. The first paragraph should contain full information about who, where, when, and how submitted the proposal (Five Ws), thus summarising the event. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1227133 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: 1. Writing tone and structure is not very clear. The article contains a few dozens of short paragraphs which are weakly related to eachother other than by having a common topic. 2. The first paragraph should contain full information about who, where, when, and how submitted the proposal (Five Ws), thus summarising the event. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 1228441 [Passed]
edit
Revision 1228441 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Neeeeeeeeeearly stale, but seems fine to me. ;) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1228441 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Neeeeeeeeeearly stale, but seems fine to me. ;) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |